[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] ahci-test: Add dependency to qemu-img tool

From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] ahci-test: Add dependency to qemu-img tool
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:03:21 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0

On 1/28/19 8:14 PM, John Snow wrote:
> On 1/28/19 11:08 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 25.01.2019 um 22:57 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>>> On 1/25/19 3:34 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> Since the ahci-test uses qemu-img, add a dependency to build it
>>>> before using it.
>>>> This fixes:
>>>>   $ gmake check-qtest V=1
>>>>   QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 
>>>> QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img tests/ahci-test
>>>>   Failed to execute child process "/tmp/qemu-test.19tMRF/qemu-img" (No 
>>>> such file or directory)
>>>>   ERROR:tests/libqos/libqos.c:192:mkimg: assertion failed: (ret && !err)
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>> RFC because while this dependency is valid, I don't think this is the
>>>> clever way to solve this problem (which is, assuming the host
>>>> distribution has the qemu-tools installed).
>>>> I guess remember a thread about it (Eric, John?) where it was asked
>>>> "What do we want to test, qemu-img or AHCI? Can we trust an unstable
>>>> version of a tool to verify a device?"
>>> [...]
>>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <address@hidden>
>> Are you taking this through your tree, or through which tree should it
>> be merged?
>> Kevin
> I can, but it'd be the only patch I have this week. If it's not a
> burden, would you mind including it?

Actually there are few follow up patches slighly related (not AHCI), so
it indeed makes sense Kevin takes them. I'll respin.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]