qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1815024] [NEW] SIGILL on instruction "stck" under


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1815024] [NEW] SIGILL on instruction "stck" under qemu-s390x in user mode
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 13:36:45 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 2019-02-07 13:15, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2/7/19 12:01 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 2019-02-07 12:46, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Il 07/02/19 12:26, Thomas Huth ha scritto:
>>>> The problem is rather that the STCK instruction is fenced with
>>>> "#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY" ... quick-n-dirty hack to allow it:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch. Unfortunately on my system it failes with:
>>>
>>>   LINK    s390x-linux-user/qemu-s390x
>>> /usr/bin/ld: ../libqemuutil.a(cpu-get-icount.o):(.bss+0x0): multiple
>>> definition of `use_icount'; exec.o:(.bss+0x58): first defined here
>>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>> make[1]: *** [Makefile:207: qemu-s390x] Error 1
>>> make: *** [Makefile:432: subdir-s390x-linux-user] Error 2
>>>
>>> The error does not appear when compiling from current master.
>>
>> I just saw it, too. Seems like the stubs/cpu-get-icount.c file now gets
>> pulled in for some reason. Try this on top:
>>
>> diff --git a/stubs/cpu-get-icount.c b/stubs/cpu-get-icount.c
>> index 35f0c1e..8da6646 100644
>> --- a/stubs/cpu-get-icount.c
>> +++ b/stubs/cpu-get-icount.c
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>  #include "sysemu/cpus.h"
>>  #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
>>
>> -int use_icount;
>> +int use_icount __attribute__((weak));
>>
>>  int64_t cpu_get_icount(void)
>>  {
>>
>> ... anyway, I'll ponder about that a little bit and will try to come up
>> with a proper, mergable patch instead.
> 
> See also
> 
>   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-11/msg06734.html
> 
> which I never followed up on the review changes requested.

Ah, right, now that you've mentioned it, it rings a bell! Do you have
some spare time to respin the series, with using time2tod() in the
HELPER(stck) function?

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]