[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] nvdimm: build FIT in nvdimm_build_acpi
From: |
Wei Yang |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] nvdimm: build FIT in nvdimm_build_acpi |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:41:56 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:14:06PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:51:01 +0800
>Wei Yang <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Currently we initialize nvdimm device like below:
>>
>> device_set_realized
>> dc->realize
>> nvdimm_plug
>> nvdimm_build_fit_buffer
>> acpi_build
>> nvdimm_build_acpi
>>
>> This shows nvdimm's acpi stuff is prepared in two places:
>>
>> * device plug stage
>> * acpi_build stage
>>
>> It would be more proper to build fit buffer in nvdimm_build_acpi, which
>> consolidate all acpi related initialization together.
>>
>> This patch moves FIT build in nvdimm_build_acpi.
>
>Does hotplug work after this change?
>
Looks no. I missed to test this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 6 +-----
>> hw/i386/pc.c | 5 -----
>> include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
>> index 2457c1aa44..6fc0c65ee0 100644
>> --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
>> +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
>> @@ -425,11 +425,6 @@ static void nvdimm_build_fit_buffer(AcpiNVDIMMState
>> *state)
>> fit_buf->dirty = true;
>> }
>>
>> -void nvdimm_plug(AcpiNVDIMMState *state)
>> -{
>> - nvdimm_build_fit_buffer(state);
>> -}
>> -
>> static void nvdimm_build_nfit(AcpiNVDIMMState *state, GArray *table_offsets,
>> GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker)
>> {
>> @@ -1338,6 +1333,7 @@ void nvdimm_build_acpi(GArray *table_offsets, GArray
>> *table_data,
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + nvdimm_build_fit_buffer(state);
>> nvdimm_build_nfit(state, table_offsets, table_data, linker);
>> g_slist_free(device_list);
>> }
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
>> index 64d9e756fa..686b610c50 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
>> @@ -2099,17 +2099,12 @@ static void pc_memory_plug(HotplugHandler
>> *hotplug_dev,
>> {
>> Error *local_err = NULL;
>> PCMachineState *pcms = PC_MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
>> - bool is_nvdimm = object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_NVDIMM);
>>
>> pc_dimm_plug(PC_DIMM(dev), MACHINE(pcms), &local_err);
>> if (local_err) {
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - if (is_nvdimm) {
>> - nvdimm_plug(&pcms->acpi_nvdimm_state);
>> - }
>> -
>> hotplug_handler_plug(HOTPLUG_HANDLER(pcms->acpi_dev), dev,
>> &error_abort);
>> out:
>> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> diff --git a/include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h b/include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h
>> index c5c9b3c7f8..30869b4834 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/mem/nvdimm.h
>> @@ -148,6 +148,5 @@ void nvdimm_init_acpi_state(AcpiNVDIMMState *state,
>> MemoryRegion *io,
>> void nvdimm_build_acpi(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data,
>> BIOSLinker *linker, AcpiNVDIMMState *state,
>> uint32_t ram_slots);
>> -void nvdimm_plug(AcpiNVDIMMState *state);
>> void nvdimm_acpi_plug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev);
>> #endif
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me