[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] slirp: remove reference to COPYRIGHT fil
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] slirp: remove reference to COPYRIGHT file |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:57:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 |
On 3/13/19 11:42 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> The slirp COPYRIGHT file is a BSD-3 license.
Is it? I only see 2 clauses listed there.
My understanding (although I may be wrong) is that 2-clause can be
strengthened to 3-clause unilaterally, but 3-clause cannot be weakened
to 2-clause without copyright owner buy-in.
> Instead of referring to
> another project file, the SPDX license notice present in all source
> files states that unequivocally.
Should we put this patch before 2/4? You'd have to reword things if you
do it in that order, though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> ---
> +++ b/slirp/src/debug.h
> @@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause */
> /*
> * Copyright (c) 1995 Danny Gasparovski.
> - *
> - * Please read the file COPYRIGHT for the
> - * terms and conditions of the copyright.
If we resolve the issue about slirp/COPYRIGHT being 2-clause or
3-clause, and we are happy with the addition of the SPDX tag in 2/4,
then this change makes sense. But I'm hesitant to give R-b to this one
without resolving those questions first.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] slirp: clarify license of slirp as BSD-3, no-reply, 2019/03/13