qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] target/mips: Optimize ILVEV.<B|H|W|D> MS


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] target/mips: Optimize ILVEV.<B|H|W|D> MSA instructions
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:37:10 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 4/2/19 7:07 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] target/mips: Optimize 
>> ILVEV.<B|H|W|D> MSA instructions
>>
>> Hi Mateja,
>>
>> On 4/2/19 5:15 PM, Mateja Marjanovic wrote:
>>> From: Mateja Marjanovic <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> Optimize set of MSA instructions ILVEV, using directly
>>> tcg registers and performing logic on them instead of
>>> using helpers.
>>
>> Maybe you can still let this previous comment (if still valid):
>>
>>   Performance measurement is done by executing the
>>   instructions large number of times on a computer
>>   with Intel Core i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz×8.
>>
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>>>
>>> In the following table, the first column is the performance
>>> before this patch. The second represents the performance,
>>> after converting from helpers to tcg, but without using
>>> tcg_gen_deposit function. The third one is the solution
>>> which is implemented in this patch.
>>
>> You are describing the "no-deposit" which refers to a previous series
>> but won't be accessible in the git repository.
>>
>> I think this table is useful in the cover of this series, and in the
>> commit message you should use || before || after || and drop the
>> "no-deposit" case.
>>
>>>
>>>  instr    ||   before    || no-deposit ||  with-deposit
>>> ========================================================
>>>  ilvev.b  ||  126.92 ms  ||  24.52 ms  ||  24.43 ms
>>>  ilvev.h  ||   93.67 ms  ||  23.92 ms  ||  23.86 ms
>>>  ilvev.w  ||  117.86 ms  ||  23.83 ms  ||  22.17 ms
>>>  ilvev.d  ||   45.49 ms  ||  19.74 ms  ||  19.71 ms
>>>
>>> The solution with deposit is suggested by Richard Henderson.
>>>
>>
> 
> I think the table should remain in the commit message, to keep it
> visible in the git logs.
> 
> You could insert the "no-deposit" source code of gen_ilvev_w()
> in the commit message, for reference reasons - it is not a too
> large function.

Clever :)

> 
> Thanks,
> Aleksandar
> 
>> The gitdm parsable form is:
>>
>> Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mateja Marjanovic <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  target/mips/helper.h     |   1 -
>>>  target/mips/msa_helper.c |   9 ----
>>>  target/mips/translate.c  | 105 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/mips/helper.h b/target/mips/helper.h
>>> index 02e16c7..82f6a40 100644
>>> --- a/target/mips/helper.h
>>> +++ b/target/mips/helper.h
>>> @@ -864,7 +864,6 @@ DEF_HELPER_5(msa_pckev_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, 
>>> i32)
>>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_pckod_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_ilvl_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_ilvr_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>> -DEF_HELPER_5(msa_ilvev_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_vshf_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_srar_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_srlr_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>> diff --git a/target/mips/msa_helper.c b/target/mips/msa_helper.c
>>> index a7ea6aa..d5c3842 100644
>>> --- a/target/mips/msa_helper.c
>>> +++ b/target/mips/msa_helper.c
>>> @@ -1197,15 +1197,6 @@ MSA_FN_DF(ilvl_df)
>>>      } while (0)
>>>  MSA_FN_DF(ilvr_df)
>>>  #undef MSA_DO
>>> -
>>> -#define MSA_DO(DF)                      \
>>> -    do {                                \
>>> -        pwx->DF[2*i]   = pwt->DF[2*i];  \
>>> -        pwx->DF[2*i+1] = pws->DF[2*i];  \
>>> -    } while (0)
>>> -MSA_FN_DF(ilvev_df)
>>> -#undef MSA_DO
>>> -
>>>  #undef MSA_LOOP_COND
>>>
>>>  #define MSA_LOOP_COND(DF) \
>>> diff --git a/target/mips/translate.c b/target/mips/translate.c
>>> index 04406d6..e26c6a6 100644
>>> --- a/target/mips/translate.c
>>> +++ b/target/mips/translate.c
>>> @@ -28974,6 +28974,94 @@ static inline void gen_ilvod_d(CPUMIPSState *env, 
>>> uint32_t wd,
>>>      tcg_gen_mov_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], msa_wr_d[ws * 2 + 1]);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * [MSA] ILVEV.B wd, ws, wt
>>> + *
>>> + *   Vector Interleave Even (byte data elements)
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +static inline void gen_ilvev_b(CPUMIPSState *env, uint32_t wd,
>>> +                               uint32_t ws, uint32_t wt)
>>> +{
>>> +    TCGv_i64 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>>> +    TCGv_i64 t2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>>> +    const uint64_t mask = 0x00ff00ff00ff00ffULL;
>>> +
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2], mask);
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2], mask);
>>> +    tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 8);
>>> +    tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], t1, t2);
>>> +
>>
>> Richard, is it cheaper to use another register to keep the constant mask
>> (here reused 4x)?
>>
>> Such:
>>
>>        TCGv_i64 mask = tcg_const_i64(0x00ff00ff00ff00ffULL);
>>
>>        tcg_gen_and_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2], mask);
>>        tcg_gen_and_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2], mask);
>>        tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 8);
>>        tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], t1, t2);
>>
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2 + 1], mask);
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2 + 1], mask);
>>
>> Here use tcg_gen_and_i64() too.
>>
>>> +    tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 8);
>>> +    tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], t1, t2);
>>> +
>>
>>        tcg_temp_free_i64(mask);
>>
>>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t1);
>>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t2);
>>
>> Mateja: Can you test for perf easily?
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * [MSA] ILVEV.H wd, ws, wt
>>> + *
>>> + *   Vector Interleave Even (halfword data elements)
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +static inline void gen_ilvev_h(CPUMIPSState *env, uint32_t wd,
>>> +                               uint32_t ws, uint32_t wt)
>>> +{
>>> +    TCGv_i64 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>>> +    TCGv_i64 t2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>>> +    const uint64_t mask = 0x0000ffff0000ffffULL;
>>> +
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2], mask);
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2], mask);
>>> +    tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 16);
>>> +    tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], t1, t2);
>>> +
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2 + 1], mask);
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2 + 1], mask);
>>> +    tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 16);
>>> +    tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], t1, t2);
>>> +
>>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t1);
>>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t2);
>>
>> Very similiar to gen_ilvev_b(), changing the mask and shift. Maybe worth
>> a refactor.
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * [MSA] ILVEV.W wd, ws, wt
>>> + *
>>> + *   Vector Interleave Even (word data elements)
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +static inline void gen_ilvev_w(CPUMIPSState *env, uint32_t wd,
>>> +                               uint32_t ws, uint32_t wt)
>>> +{
>>> +    TCGv_i64 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>>> +    const uint64_t mask = 0x00000000ffffffffULL;
>>> +
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2], mask);
>>> +    tcg_gen_deposit_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], t1, msa_wr_d[ws * 2], 32, 32);
>>> +
>>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2 + 1], mask);
>>> +    tcg_gen_deposit_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], t1, msa_wr_d[ws * 2 + 1], 
>>> 32, 32);
>>> +
>>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t1);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * [MSA] ILVEV.D wd, ws, wt
>>> + *
>>> + *   Vector Interleave Even (Double data elements)
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +static inline void gen_ilvev_d(CPUMIPSState *env, uint32_t wd,
>>> +                               uint32_t ws, uint32_t wt)
>>> +{
>>> +    tcg_gen_mov_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], msa_wr_d[ws * 2]);
>>> +    tcg_gen_mov_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], msa_wr_d[wt * 2]);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static void gen_msa_3r(CPUMIPSState *env, DisasContext *ctx)
>>>  {
>>>  #define MASK_MSA_3R(op)    (MASK_MSA_MINOR(op) | (op & (0x7 << 23)))
>>> @@ -29130,7 +29218,22 @@ static void gen_msa_3r(CPUMIPSState *env, 
>>> DisasContext *ctx)
>>>          gen_helper_msa_mod_s_df(cpu_env, tdf, twd, tws, twt);
>>>          break;
>>>      case OPC_ILVEV_df:
>>> -        gen_helper_msa_ilvev_df(cpu_env, tdf, twd, tws, twt);
>>> +        switch (df) {
>>> +        case DF_BYTE:
>>> +            gen_ilvev_b(env, wd, ws, wt);
>>> +            break;
>>> +        case DF_HALF:
>>> +            gen_ilvev_h(env, wd, ws, wt);
>>> +            break;
>>> +        case DF_WORD:
>>> +            gen_ilvev_w(env, wd, ws, wt);
>>> +            break;
>>> +        case DF_DOUBLE:
>>> +            gen_ilvev_d(env, wd, ws, wt);
>>> +            break;
>>> +        default:
>>> +            assert(0);
>>> +        }
>>>          break;
>>>      case OPC_BINSR_df:
>>>          gen_helper_msa_binsr_df(cpu_env, tdf, twd, tws, twt);
>>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Phil.
>>
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 6:19:19 PM
> To: Mateja Marjanovic; address@hidden
> Cc: Aleksandar Rikalo; address@hidden; Aleksandar Markovic; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] target/mips: Optimize 
> ILVEV.<B|H|W|D> MSA instructions
> 
> Hi Mateja,
> 
> On 4/2/19 5:15 PM, Mateja Marjanovic wrote:
>> From: Mateja Marjanovic <address@hidden>
>>
>> Optimize set of MSA instructions ILVEV, using directly
>> tcg registers and performing logic on them instead of
>> using helpers.
> 
> Maybe you can still let this previous comment (if still valid):
> 
>   Performance measurement is done by executing the
>   instructions large number of times on a computer
>   with Intel Core i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz×8.
> 
>>
>> In the following table, the first column is the performance
>> before this patch. The second represents the performance,
>> after converting from helpers to tcg, but without using
>> tcg_gen_deposit function. The third one is the solution
>> which is implemented in this patch.
> 
> You are describing the "no-deposit" which refers to a previous series
> but won't be accessible in the git repository.
> 
> I think this table is useful in the cover of this series, and in the
> commit message you should use || before || after || and drop the
> "no-deposit" case.
> 
>>
>>  instr    ||   before    || no-deposit ||  with-deposit
>> ========================================================
>>  ilvev.b  ||  126.92 ms  ||  24.52 ms  ||  24.43 ms
>>  ilvev.h  ||   93.67 ms  ||  23.92 ms  ||  23.86 ms
>>  ilvev.w  ||  117.86 ms  ||  23.83 ms  ||  22.17 ms
>>  ilvev.d  ||   45.49 ms  ||  19.74 ms  ||  19.71 ms
>>
>> The solution with deposit is suggested by Richard Henderson.
>>
> 
> The gitdm parsable form is:
> 
> Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mateja Marjanovic <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/mips/helper.h     |   1 -
>>  target/mips/msa_helper.c |   9 ----
>>  target/mips/translate.c  | 105 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/mips/helper.h b/target/mips/helper.h
>> index 02e16c7..82f6a40 100644
>> --- a/target/mips/helper.h
>> +++ b/target/mips/helper.h
>> @@ -864,7 +864,6 @@ DEF_HELPER_5(msa_pckev_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_pckod_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_ilvl_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_ilvr_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>> -DEF_HELPER_5(msa_ilvev_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_vshf_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_srar_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>>  DEF_HELPER_5(msa_srlr_df, void, env, i32, i32, i32, i32)
>> diff --git a/target/mips/msa_helper.c b/target/mips/msa_helper.c
>> index a7ea6aa..d5c3842 100644
>> --- a/target/mips/msa_helper.c
>> +++ b/target/mips/msa_helper.c
>> @@ -1197,15 +1197,6 @@ MSA_FN_DF(ilvl_df)
>>      } while (0)
>>  MSA_FN_DF(ilvr_df)
>>  #undef MSA_DO
>> -
>> -#define MSA_DO(DF)                      \
>> -    do {                                \
>> -        pwx->DF[2*i]   = pwt->DF[2*i];  \
>> -        pwx->DF[2*i+1] = pws->DF[2*i];  \
>> -    } while (0)
>> -MSA_FN_DF(ilvev_df)
>> -#undef MSA_DO
>> -
>>  #undef MSA_LOOP_COND
>>
>>  #define MSA_LOOP_COND(DF) \
>> diff --git a/target/mips/translate.c b/target/mips/translate.c
>> index 04406d6..e26c6a6 100644
>> --- a/target/mips/translate.c
>> +++ b/target/mips/translate.c
>> @@ -28974,6 +28974,94 @@ static inline void gen_ilvod_d(CPUMIPSState *env, 
>> uint32_t wd,
>>      tcg_gen_mov_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], msa_wr_d[ws * 2 + 1]);
>>  }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * [MSA] ILVEV.B wd, ws, wt
>> + *
>> + *   Vector Interleave Even (byte data elements)
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static inline void gen_ilvev_b(CPUMIPSState *env, uint32_t wd,
>> +                               uint32_t ws, uint32_t wt)
>> +{
>> +    TCGv_i64 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> +    TCGv_i64 t2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> +    const uint64_t mask = 0x00ff00ff00ff00ffULL;
>> +
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2], mask);
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2], mask);
>> +    tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 8);
>> +    tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], t1, t2);
>> +
> 
> Richard, is it cheaper to use another register to keep the constant mask
> (here reused 4x)?
> 
> Such:
> 
>        TCGv_i64 mask = tcg_const_i64(0x00ff00ff00ff00ffULL);
> 
>        tcg_gen_and_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2], mask);
>        tcg_gen_and_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2], mask);
>        tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 8);
>        tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], t1, t2);
> 
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2 + 1], mask);
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2 + 1], mask);
> 
> Here use tcg_gen_and_i64() too.
> 
>> +    tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 8);
>> +    tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], t1, t2);
>> +
> 
>        tcg_temp_free_i64(mask);
> 
>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t1);
>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t2);
> 
> Mateja: Can you test for perf easily?
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * [MSA] ILVEV.H wd, ws, wt
>> + *
>> + *   Vector Interleave Even (halfword data elements)
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static inline void gen_ilvev_h(CPUMIPSState *env, uint32_t wd,
>> +                               uint32_t ws, uint32_t wt)
>> +{
>> +    TCGv_i64 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> +    TCGv_i64 t2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> +    const uint64_t mask = 0x0000ffff0000ffffULL;
>> +
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2], mask);
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2], mask);
>> +    tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 16);
>> +    tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], t1, t2);
>> +
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2 + 1], mask);
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t2, msa_wr_d[ws * 2 + 1], mask);
>> +    tcg_gen_shli_i64(t2, t2, 16);
>> +    tcg_gen_or_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], t1, t2);
>> +
>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t1);
>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t2);
> 
> Very similiar to gen_ilvev_b(), changing the mask and shift. Maybe worth
> a refactor.
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * [MSA] ILVEV.W wd, ws, wt
>> + *
>> + *   Vector Interleave Even (word data elements)
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static inline void gen_ilvev_w(CPUMIPSState *env, uint32_t wd,
>> +                               uint32_t ws, uint32_t wt)
>> +{
>> +    TCGv_i64 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> +    const uint64_t mask = 0x00000000ffffffffULL;
>> +
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2], mask);
>> +    tcg_gen_deposit_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], t1, msa_wr_d[ws * 2], 32, 32);
>> +
>> +    tcg_gen_andi_i64(t1, msa_wr_d[wt * 2 + 1], mask);
>> +    tcg_gen_deposit_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], t1, msa_wr_d[ws * 2 + 1], 32, 
>> 32);
>> +
>> +    tcg_temp_free_i64(t1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * [MSA] ILVEV.D wd, ws, wt
>> + *
>> + *   Vector Interleave Even (Double data elements)
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static inline void gen_ilvev_d(CPUMIPSState *env, uint32_t wd,
>> +                               uint32_t ws, uint32_t wt)
>> +{
>> +    tcg_gen_mov_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2 + 1], msa_wr_d[ws * 2]);
>> +    tcg_gen_mov_i64(msa_wr_d[wd * 2], msa_wr_d[wt * 2]);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void gen_msa_3r(CPUMIPSState *env, DisasContext *ctx)
>>  {
>>  #define MASK_MSA_3R(op)    (MASK_MSA_MINOR(op) | (op & (0x7 << 23)))
>> @@ -29130,7 +29218,22 @@ static void gen_msa_3r(CPUMIPSState *env, 
>> DisasContext *ctx)
>>          gen_helper_msa_mod_s_df(cpu_env, tdf, twd, tws, twt);
>>          break;
>>      case OPC_ILVEV_df:
>> -        gen_helper_msa_ilvev_df(cpu_env, tdf, twd, tws, twt);
>> +        switch (df) {
>> +        case DF_BYTE:
>> +            gen_ilvev_b(env, wd, ws, wt);
>> +            break;
>> +        case DF_HALF:
>> +            gen_ilvev_h(env, wd, ws, wt);
>> +            break;
>> +        case DF_WORD:
>> +            gen_ilvev_w(env, wd, ws, wt);
>> +            break;
>> +        case DF_DOUBLE:
>> +            gen_ilvev_d(env, wd, ws, wt);
>> +            break;
>> +        default:
>> +            assert(0);
>> +        }
>>          break;
>>      case OPC_BINSR_df:
>>          gen_helper_msa_binsr_df(cpu_env, tdf, twd, tws, twt);
>>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Phil.
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]