qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Add test for supporte


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] block/pflash_cfi02: Add test for supported commands
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 10:40:14 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 09/04/2019 10.35, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> On 09/04/2019 09.45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> We'd like to get rid of global_qtest in the long run (since it is
>>>> causing trouble for tests that run multiple instances of QEMU in
>>>> parallel, e.g. migration tests)... so if it is feasible, please don't
>>>> use it in new code anymore. Try to use a local variable in the function
>>>> that call qtest_initf() and pass the test state around via a parameter
>>>> to the functions that need it.
>>>
>>> Twenty tests still use @global_qtest
>>>
>>> Either we're serious about getting rid of @global_qtest.  Then we should
>>> just do it.
>>
>> Ha ha, "just do it" ... that's quite a bit of work, actually. It's not
>> just about grep'ing for global_qtest, you also have to replace all the
>> writel(), readl() etc. functions with qtest_writel(), qtest_readl() etc.
> 
> And that's precisely why I'm reluctant to demand this work from
> contributors.  Asking nicely is of course fair.

That's what I did, didn't I? I said "... so if it is feasible, please
don't use it in new code anymore". I did not say "you must not use this
in new code anymore". So where's your problem here, Markus?

Stephen, for the records, in case my mail was not clear: I'm fine if you
keep the code as it currently is. But I'd be really happy if you could
change it to avoid global_qtest.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]