qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 20/26] target/arm: New helper function arm_v7m_mmu_i


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 20/26] target/arm: New helper function arm_v7m_mmu_idx_all()
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:57:38 +0100

Add a new helper function which returns the MMU index to use
for v7M, where the caller specifies all of the security
state, privilege level and whether the execution priority
is negative, and reimplement the existing
arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate_and_priv() in terms of it.

We are going to need this for the lazy-FP-stacking code.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
---
Suggestions for better function name welcome.
arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate_and_priv_and_negpri()
just seems way too long and unwieldy...
---
 target/arm/cpu.h    |  7 +++++++
 target/arm/helper.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 500e0ab4c5d..0a1b82dc996 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -2912,6 +2912,13 @@ static inline int arm_mmu_idx_to_el(ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx)
     }
 }
 
+/*
+ * Return the MMU index for a v7M CPU with all relevant information
+ * manually specified.
+ */
+ARMMMUIdx arm_v7m_mmu_idx_all(CPUARMState *env,
+                              bool secstate, bool priv, bool negpri);
+
 /* Return the MMU index for a v7M CPU in the specified security and
  * privilege state.
  */
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 2feb3f664fe..c8e30b40366 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -13235,8 +13235,8 @@ int fp_exception_el(CPUARMState *env, int cur_el)
     return 0;
 }
 
-ARMMMUIdx arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate_and_priv(CPUARMState *env,
-                                                bool secstate, bool priv)
+ARMMMUIdx arm_v7m_mmu_idx_all(CPUARMState *env,
+                              bool secstate, bool priv, bool negpri)
 {
     ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx = ARM_MMU_IDX_M;
 
@@ -13244,7 +13244,7 @@ ARMMMUIdx 
arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate_and_priv(CPUARMState *env,
         mmu_idx |= ARM_MMU_IDX_M_PRIV;
     }
 
-    if (armv7m_nvic_neg_prio_requested(env->nvic, secstate)) {
+    if (negpri) {
         mmu_idx |= ARM_MMU_IDX_M_NEGPRI;
     }
 
@@ -13255,6 +13255,14 @@ ARMMMUIdx 
arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate_and_priv(CPUARMState *env,
     return mmu_idx;
 }
 
+ARMMMUIdx arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate_and_priv(CPUARMState *env,
+                                                bool secstate, bool priv)
+{
+    bool negpri = armv7m_nvic_neg_prio_requested(env->nvic, secstate);
+
+    return arm_v7m_mmu_idx_all(env, secstate, priv, negpri);
+}
+
 /* Return the MMU index for a v7M CPU in the specified security state */
 ARMMMUIdx arm_v7m_mmu_idx_for_secstate(CPUARMState *env, bool secstate)
 {
-- 
2.20.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]