qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 08/10] target/arm: Conditionalize some asserts on


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 08/10] target/arm: Conditionalize some asserts on aarch32 support
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 15:11:36 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 5/24/19 2:33 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/02/18 18:16, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> From: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
>>
>> When populating id registers from kvm, on a host that doesn't support
>> aarch32 mode at all, neither arm_div nor jazelle will be supported either.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>> Tested-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>> Message-id: address@hidden
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/arm/cpu.h |  5 +++++
>>  target/arm/cpu.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
>> index 8e6779936eb..b5eff79f73b 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
>> @@ -3296,6 +3296,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_fp16(const 
>> ARMISARegisters *id)
>>      return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr0, ID_AA64PFR0, FP) == 1;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_aa32(const ARMISARegisters *id)
>> +{
>> +    return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr0, ID_AA64PFR0, EL0) >= 2;

FWIW here we check EL0, ...

>> +}
>> +
>>  static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_sve(const ARMISARegisters *id)
>>  {
>>      return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr0, ID_AA64PFR0, SVE) != 0;
>> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
>> index 8f16e96b6c8..784a4c2dfcc 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
>> @@ -774,6 +774,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>      CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
>>      int pagebits;
>>      Error *local_err = NULL;
>> +    bool no_aa32 = false;
>>  
>>      /* If we needed to query the host kernel for the CPU features
>>       * then it's possible that might have failed in the initfn, but
>> @@ -820,6 +821,16 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>              set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V7VE);
>>          }
>>      }
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * There exist AArch64 cpus without AArch32 support.  When KVM
>> +     * queries ID_ISAR0_EL1 on such a host, the value is UNKNOWN.

... then here the comment is about EL1.

>> +     * Similarly, we cannot check ID_AA64PFR0 without AArch64 support.
>> +     */
>> +    if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
>> +        no_aa32 = !cpu_isar_feature(aa64_aa32, cpu);
>> +    }
>> +
>>      if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V7VE)) {
>>          /* v7 Virtualization Extensions. In real hardware this implies
>>           * EL2 and also the presence of the Security Extensions.
>> @@ -829,7 +840,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>           * Presence of EL2 itself is ARM_FEATURE_EL2, and of the
>>           * Security Extensions is ARM_FEATURE_EL3.
>>           */
>> -        assert(cpu_isar_feature(arm_div, cpu));
>> +        assert(no_aa32 || cpu_isar_feature(arm_div, cpu));
> 
> The assertion above fails on my AArch64 host (APM Mustang A3). Meaning
> that my host CPU supports AArch32, but lacks "arm_div".
> 
> (My understanding is that this commit, i.e., 0f8d06f16c9d, relaxed the
> assert originally added in commit 7e0cf8b47f0e ("target/arm: Convert
> division from feature bits to isar0 tests", 2018-10-24). Can we relax it
> even further?
> 
> Better yet: can we rework the code to emit a warning, rather than
> aborting QEMU? Assertions are not the best tool IMHO for catching
> unusual (or slightly non-conformant / early) hardware.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Laszlo
> 
>>          set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_LPAE);
>>          set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V7);
>>      }
>> @@ -855,7 +866,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>      if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V6)) {
>>          set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V5);
>>          if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)) {
>> -            assert(cpu_isar_feature(jazelle, cpu));
>> +            assert(no_aa32 || cpu_isar_feature(jazelle, cpu));
>>              set_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_AUXCR);
>>          }
>>      }
>>
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]