qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [multiprocess RFC PATCH 36/37] multi-process: add the c


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [multiprocess RFC PATCH 36/37] multi-process: add the concept description to docs/devel/qemu-multiprocess
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:24:13 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:54:35PM -0700, Elena Ufimtseva wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:18:20AM -0700, Elena Ufimtseva wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:11:30PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > Hi Jag and Elena,
> > > Do you think a call would help to move discussion along more quickly?
> > >
> > 
> > Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > We would like to join this call.
> > And thank you inviting us!
> > 
> > Elena
> > > We could use the next KVM Community Call on June 4th to discuss
> > > remaining concerns and the next steps:
> > > https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=dG9iMXRqcXAzN3Y4ZXZwNzRoMHE4a3BqcXNAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ
> > >
> > > I also hope to include other core QEMU developers.  As you know, I'm
> > > skeptical, but it could be just me and I don't want to block you
> > > unnecessarily if others are more enthusiastic about this approach.
> > >
> 
> Hi Stefan
> 
> A few questions we have are about the call.
> What is the format of the call usually? Should we provide some kind of the 
> project outline for 5 minutes?
> We are planning to address some of the concerns you have voiced in regards to 
> amount of changes, usability,
> security and performance. I assume there will be other questions as well. Is 
> there any time limit per topic?
> 
> And would you mind sharing the call details with us?

Hi Elena and Jag,
Sorry, I was away on sick leave.  The KVM Community Call is informal.
The goal is to get people together in a teleconference where we can
discuss topics much more quickly than on the mailing list.  This can
help make progress in areas where the mailing list discussion seems to
be making slow progress.

I would suggest starting with a status update the describes your
current approach (without assuming the audience has familiarity).  Then
you could touch on any issues where you'd like input from the community
and you could take questions.

Our goal should be to get a consensus on whether disaggregated QEMU can
be merged or not.

Here are the calendar details (Tuesday, June 18th at 8:00 UTC):
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ical/tob1tjqp37v8evp74h0q8kpjqs%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics

Is this time okay for you?

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]