qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/8] numa: move numa global variable numa_inf


From: Tao Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/8] numa: move numa global variable numa_info into MachineState
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 10:01:21 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2

On 6/28/2019 7:20 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:56:22 +0800
Tao Xu <address@hidden> wrote:

Move existing numa global numa_info (renamed as "nodes") into NumaState.

Reviewed-by: Liu Jingqi <address@hidden>
Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Tao Xu <address@hidden>
---

Changes in v5 -> v4:
     - Directly use ms->numa_state->nodes and not dereferencing
     ms->numa_state in the first place when ms->numa_state is possible
     NULL (Igor)

the sa,e like in previous patch,
use ms->numa_state->nodes directly whenever possible without using
intermediate local variable

---
  exec.c                   |  2 +-
  hw/acpi/aml-build.c      |  6 ++++--
  hw/arm/boot.c            |  2 +-
  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c |  7 ++++---
  hw/arm/virt.c            |  1 +
  hw/i386/pc.c             |  4 ++--
  hw/ppc/spapr.c           |  4 +++-
  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c       |  1 +
  include/sysemu/numa.h    |  3 +++
  numa.c                   | 15 +++++++++------
  10 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index c7eb4af42d..0e30926588 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -1763,7 +1763,7 @@ long qemu_minrampagesize(void)
      if (hpsize > mainrampagesize &&
          (ms->numa_state == NULL ||
           ms->numa_state->num_nodes == 0 ||
-         numa_info[0].node_memdev == NULL)) {
+         ms->numa_state->nodes[0].node_memdev == NULL)) {
          static bool warned;
          if (!warned) {
              error_report("Huge page support disabled (n/a for main memory).");
diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
index 63c1cae8c9..26ccc1a3e2 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
@@ -1737,8 +1737,10 @@ void build_slit(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, 
MachineState *ms)
      build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, nb_numa_nodes, 8);
      for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
          for (j = 0; j < nb_numa_nodes; j++) {
-            assert(numa_info[i].distance[j]);
-            build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, numa_info[i].distance[j], 1);
+            assert(ms->numa_state->nodes[i].distance[j]);
+            build_append_int_noprefix(table_data,
+                                      ms->numa_state->nodes[i].distance[j],
+                                      1);
          }
      }
diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c
index 2af881e0f4..0c1572d118 100644
--- a/hw/arm/boot.c
+++ b/hw/arm/boot.c
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ int arm_load_dtb(hwaddr addr, const struct arm_boot_info 
*binfo,
      if (ms->numa_state != NULL && ms->numa_state->num_nodes > 0) {
          mem_base = binfo->loader_start;
          for (i = 0; i < ms->numa_state->num_nodes; i++) {
-            mem_len = numa_info[i].node_mem;
+            mem_len = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
              rc = fdt_add_memory_node(fdt, acells, mem_base,
                                       scells, mem_len, i);
              if (rc < 0) {
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
index 9d2edd8023..422bbed2d3 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
@@ -536,11 +536,12 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, 
VirtMachineState *vms)
mem_base = vms->memmap[VIRT_MEM].base;
      for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; ++i) {
-        if (numa_info[i].node_mem > 0) {
+        if (ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem > 0) {
              numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof(*numamem));
-            build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, numa_info[i].node_mem, i,
+            build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base,
+                              ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem, i,
                                MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
-            mem_base += numa_info[i].node_mem;
+            mem_base += ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
          }
      }
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index d147cceab6..d3904d74dc 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ static void create_fdt(VirtMachineState *vms)
          int size = nb_numa_nodes * nb_numa_nodes * 3 * sizeof(uint32_t);
          uint32_t *matrix = g_malloc0(size);
          int idx, i, j;
+        NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;

          for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
              for (j = 0; j < nb_numa_nodes; j++) {
diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index 5bab78e137..4cc84c5050 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ static FWCfgState *bochs_bios_init(AddressSpace *as, 
PCMachineState *pcms)
      }
      for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
          numa_fw_cfg[pcms->apic_id_limit + 1 + i] =
-            cpu_to_le64(numa_info[i].node_mem);
+            cpu_to_le64(ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem);
      }
      fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_NUMA, numa_fw_cfg,
                       (1 + pcms->apic_id_limit + nb_numa_nodes) *
@@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ void pc_guest_info_init(PCMachineState *pcms)
      pcms->node_mem = g_malloc0(pcms->numa_nodes *
                                      sizeof *pcms->node_mem);
      for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
-        pcms->node_mem[i] = numa_info[i].node_mem;
+        pcms->node_mem[i] = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
      }
pcms->machine_done.notify = pc_machine_done;
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index 07a02db99e..3f2e6e0f5f 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ static hwaddr spapr_node0_size(MachineState *machine)
      int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
      if (nb_numa_nodes) {
          int i;
+        NodeInfo *numa_info = machine->numa_state->nodes;
          for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; ++i) {
              if (numa_info[i].node_mem) {
                  return MIN(pow2floor(numa_info[i].node_mem),
@@ -395,7 +396,7 @@ static int spapr_populate_memory(SpaprMachineState *spapr, 
void *fdt)
      MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
      hwaddr mem_start, node_size;
      int i;
-    NodeInfo *nodes = numa_info;
+    NodeInfo *nodes = machine->numa_state->nodes;
      NodeInfo ramnode;
/* No NUMA nodes, assume there is just one node with whole RAM */
@@ -2521,6 +2522,7 @@ static void spapr_validate_node_memory(MachineState 
*machine, Error **errp)
  {
      int i;
      int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
+    NodeInfo *numa_info = machine->numa_state->nodes;
if (machine->ram_size % SPAPR_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE) {
          error_setg(errp, "Memory size 0x" RAM_ADDR_FMT
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
index d6fd018dd4..9d4ebd60de 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
@@ -1639,6 +1639,7 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
**errp)
      SpaprPhbState *sphb = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(s);
      PCIHostState *phb = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(s);
      MachineState *ms = MACHINE(spapr);
+    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
      char *namebuf;
      int i;
      PCIBus *bus;
diff --git a/include/sysemu/numa.h b/include/sysemu/numa.h
index 08a86080c4..437eb21fef 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/numa.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/numa.h
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ struct NumaState {
/* Allow setting NUMA distance for different NUMA nodes */
      bool have_numa_distance;
+
+    /* NUMA nodes information */
+    NodeInfo nodes[MAX_NODES];
  };
  typedef struct NumaState NumaState;

Shouldn't you remove global numa_info var from header as well?

diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
index 9432d42ad0..d23e130bce 100644
--- a/numa.c
+++ b/numa.c
@@ -52,9 +52,6 @@ static int have_memdevs = -1;
  static int max_numa_nodeid; /* Highest specified NUMA node ID, plus one.
                               * For all nodes, nodeid < max_numa_nodeid
                               */
-bool have_numa_distance;
-NodeInfo numa_info[MAX_NODES];
-
static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions *node,
                              Error **errp)
@@ -63,6 +60,7 @@ static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions 
*node,
      uint16_t nodenr;
      uint16List *cpus = NULL;
      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
+    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
if (node->has_nodeid) {
          nodenr = node->nodeid;
@@ -144,6 +142,7 @@ void parse_numa_distance(MachineState *ms, NumaDistOptions 
*dist, Error **errp)
      uint16_t src = dist->src;
      uint16_t dst = dist->dst;
      uint8_t val = dist->val;
+    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
if (src >= MAX_NODES || dst >= MAX_NODES) {
          error_setg(errp, "Parameter '%s' expects an integer between 0 and %d",
@@ -203,7 +202,7 @@ void set_numa_options(MachineState *ms, NumaOptions 
*object, Error **errp)
              error_setg(&err, "Missing mandatory node-id property");
              goto end;
          }
-        if (!numa_info[object->u.cpu.node_id].present) {
+        if (!ms->numa_state->nodes[object->u.cpu.node_id].present) {
              error_setg(&err, "Invalid node-id=%" PRId64 ", NUMA node must be "
                  "defined with -numa node,nodeid=ID before it's used with "
                  "-numa cpu,node-id=ID", object->u.cpu.node_id);
@@ -263,6 +262,7 @@ static void validate_numa_distance(MachineState *ms)
      int src, dst;
      bool is_asymmetrical = false;
      int nb_numa_nodes = ms->numa_state->num_nodes;
+    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
for (src = 0; src < nb_numa_nodes; src++) {
          for (dst = src; dst < nb_numa_nodes; dst++) {
@@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ static void complete_init_numa_distance(MachineState *ms)
  {
      int src, dst;
      int nb_numa_nodes = ms->numa_state->num_nodes;
+    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
/* Fixup NUMA distance by symmetric policy because if it is an
       * asymmetric distance table, it should be a complete table and
@@ -363,6 +364,7 @@ void numa_complete_configuration(MachineState *ms)
  {
      int i;
      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
+    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
/*
       * If memory hotplug is enabled (slots > 0) but without '-numa'
@@ -534,8 +536,8 @@ void memory_region_allocate_system_memory(MemoryRegion *mr, 
Object *owner,
memory_region_init(mr, owner, name, ram_size);
      for (i = 0; i < ms->numa_state->num_nodes; i++) {
-        uint64_t size = numa_info[i].node_mem;
-        HostMemoryBackend *backend = numa_info[i].node_memdev;
+        uint64_t size = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
+        HostMemoryBackend *backend = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_memdev;
          if (!backend) {
              continue;
          }
@@ -594,6 +596,7 @@ static void numa_stat_memory_devices(NumaNodeMem node_mem[])
  void query_numa_node_mem(NumaNodeMem node_mem[], MachineState *ms)
  {
      int i;
+    NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
well, look line below where you care about NULL check and suddenly
you don't care about it being NULL right above that check.


Thanks. I will correct the mistake here.
if (ms->numa_state == NULL || ms->numa_state->num_nodes <= 0) {
          return;





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]