Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] block/backup: hoist bitmap check into QMP interface

[Max Reitz]

On 10.07.19 03:05, John Snow wrote:
> This is nicer to do in the unified QMP interface that we have now,
> because it lets us use the right terminology back at the user.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Snow <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block/backup.c | 13 ++++---------
>  blockdev.c     | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
> index e2729cf6fa..a64b768e24 100644
> --- a/block/backup.c
> +++ b/block/backup.c
> @@ -566,6 +566,10 @@ BlockJob *backup_job_create(const char *job_id, 
> BlockDriverState *bs,
>      assert(bs);
>      assert(target);
>  
> +    /* QMP interface protects us from these cases */
> +    assert(sync_mode != MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_INCREMENTAL);
> +    assert(sync_bitmap || sync_mode != MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_BITMAP);

Implication would be a nice operator sometimes.

("assert(sync_mode == MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_BITMAP -> sync_bitmap)")

(Can you do that in C++?  No, you can’t overload bool’s operators, right?)

Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature