qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 27/28] sysemu: Move the VMChangeStateEntry typed


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 27/28] sysemu: Move the VMChangeStateEntry typedef to qemu/typedefs.h
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 18:26:55 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)

Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:

> On 02/08/19 15:16, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> * VMChangeStateEntry and the three functions using it, obviously, along
>>   with VMChangeStateHandler.
>> 
>> * vm_state_notify(), because it belongs to the above.
>> 
>> * The runstate_FOO() functions, because they're named like the new
>>   header?
>> 
>> * vm_stop(), vm_stop_force_state(), vmstop_requested(),
>>   vmstop_requested, because they use RunState?
>> 
>> * The remaining vm_FOO(), because they're closely related to vm_stop()?
>> 
>> * Everything else from qemu_exit_preconfig_request() to
>>   qemu_remove_exit_notifier(), along with WakeupReason?
>
> Yes, that could be an idea, but not qemu_add/remove_exit_notifier.

I did this in v2 this instead of creating sysemu/vmstate-notify.h.

Reminder:

* PATCH 27 "sysemu: Move the VMChangeStateEntry typedef to
  qemu/typedefs.h" makes the subsequent patches more effective: it saves
  ~800 dependencies on whatever header defines the typedef.

* PATCH 28 "Include sysemu/sysemu.h a lot less" succeeds almost entirely
  due to not including it from hw/qdev-core.h.  Damage done by recent
  commit e965ffa70a "qdev: add qdev_add_vm_change_state_handler()".

  The stupidest way to undo that damage would be moving
  qdev_add_vm_change_state_handler() to sysemu/sysemu.h.

  I chose to move it to new sysemu/vmstate-notify.h along with its
  buddies from sysemu/sysemu.h.  The dependency improvement is
  negligible, just because it makes sysemu/sysemu.h less of a dumping
  ground.

For v2, I flipped PATCH 28 to the stupidest way, and put it *before*
PATCH 27.  I split off sysemu/runstate.h only in PATCH 29.  I hope that
way the benefit of each change is more obvious.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]