qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 03/28] target/riscv: Add the force HS excepti


From: Chih-Min Chao
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 03/28] target/riscv: Add the force HS exception mode
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 23:46:21 +0800

On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 7:50 AM Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.h        |  2 ++
>  target/riscv/cpu_bits.h   |  6 ++++++
>  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> index 0ef1ecb0e0..3a95c41428 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> @@ -261,6 +261,8 @@ bool riscv_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int
> interrupt_request);
>  bool riscv_cpu_fp_enabled(CPURISCVState *env);
>  bool riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(CPURISCVState *env);
>  void riscv_cpu_set_virt_enabled(CPURISCVState *env, bool enable);
> +bool riscv_cpu_force_hs_excep_enabled(CPURISCVState *env);
> +void riscv_cpu_set_force_hs_excep(CPURISCVState *env, bool enable);
>  int riscv_cpu_mmu_index(CPURISCVState *env, bool ifetch);
>  hwaddr riscv_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(CPUState *cpu, vaddr addr);
>  void  riscv_cpu_do_unaligned_access(CPUState *cs, vaddr addr,
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> index 1fbde516be..204d9d9a79 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> @@ -428,6 +428,12 @@
>  #define VIRT_MODE_SHIFT     0
>  #define VIRT_MODE_MASK      (1 << VIRT_MODE_SHIFT)
>
> +/* HS-level exception modes */
> +#define CLEAR_HS_EXCEP        0
> +#define FORCE_HS_EXCEP        1
> +#define FORCE_HS_EXCEP_SHIFT  1
> +#define FORCE_HS_EXCEP_MASK   (1 << FORCE_HS_EXCEP_SHIFT)
> +
>  /* RV32 satp CSR field masks */
>  #define SATP32_MODE         0x80000000
>  #define SATP32_ASID         0x7fc00000
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> index 7b0bb14c01..5bcfc2e090 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,29 @@ void riscv_cpu_set_virt_enabled(CPURISCVState *env,
> bool enable)
>      env->virt |= enable << VIRT_MODE_SHIFT;
>  }
>
> +bool riscv_cpu_force_hs_excep_enabled(CPURISCVState *env)
> +{
> +    bool tmp;
> +
> +    if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVH)) {
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +
> +    tmp = (env->virt & FORCE_HS_EXCEP_MASK) >> FORCE_HS_EXCEP_SHIFT;
> +
> +    return tmp == FORCE_HS_EXCEP;
> +}
> +
> +void riscv_cpu_set_force_hs_excep(CPURISCVState *env, bool enable)
> +{
> +    if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVH)) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    env->virt &= ~FORCE_HS_EXCEP_MASK;
> +    env->virt |= enable << FORCE_HS_EXCEP_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
>  int riscv_cpu_claim_interrupts(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t interrupts)
>  {
>      CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> --
> 2.22.0
>
>
> I have the same option as [PATCH 2/28].  Why not to use get_field and
set_field ?

chihmin


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]