[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] cputlb: Introduce TLB_BSWAP
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] cputlb: Introduce TLB_BSWAP |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:07:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 9/11/19 10:56 AM, Tony Nguyen wrote:
>> @@ -1372,26 +1364,27 @@ load_helper(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr,
>> TCGMemOpIdx oi,
>> /* On watchpoint hit, this will longjmp out. */
>> cpu_check_watchpoint(env_cpu(env), addr, size,
>> iotlbentry->attrs, BP_MEM_READ, retaddr);
>> -
>> - /* The backing page may or may not require I/O. */
>> - tlb_addr &= ~TLB_WATCHPOINT;
>> - if ((tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == 0) {
>> - goto do_aligned_access;
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> /* Handle I/O access. */
>> - return io_readx(env, iotlbentry, mmu_idx, addr,
>> - retaddr, access_type, op);
>> - }
>> + if (likely(tlb_addr & TLB_MMIO)) {
>> + return io_readx(env, iotlbentry, mmu_idx, addr,
>> + retaddr, access_type,
>> + op ^ (tlb_addr & TLB_BSWAP ? MO_BSWAP : 0));
>> + }
>
> Previously, the end of if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) branch
> called and returned the result of io_readx.
Correct. However, rather thank clearing TLB_WATCHPOINT and TLB_BSWAP, it
seemed easier to test for those bits that *do* require that we call io_readx.
As we've seen from the bug leading to this patch set, it's invalid to call
io_readx on anything that doesn't have TLB_MMIO set -- we'll either crash due
to the missing read accessor or reach the point at which we issue a bus error
for an i/o operation without a device.
BTW, there's a bug in this same location for store_helper in that I need to
also test for TLB_NOTDIRTY, which also goes through io_writex for the moment.
That bug is trivially shown during the make check migration tests. Due to the
late hour I failed to run those before posting this patch set. Will be fixed
in v2.
r~