Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 0/6] tests/acceptance: Add tests for the PReP/40p machine

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 9/17/19 1:40 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:19:52PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:56:06AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 9/16/19 11:52 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/16/19 2:42 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 11:19:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>>>>> Quick tests worth to avoid regressions with the 40p machine.
>>>>>>> idea from the "Maintainers, please tell us how to boot your machines"
>>>>>>> thread:
>>>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-03/msg04177.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v2: Split Travis job, added Hervé R-b tag
>>>>>>> v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg05896.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Phil.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm guessing you're expecting these to go in via the testing tree, in
>>>>>> which case
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Acked-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, appreciated :)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Or do you want me to take them via the ppc tree?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the 'testing tree' should focus on the CI/testing
>>>>> infrastructure, while each subsystem maintainers should care about the
>>>>> tests covering their subsystem (the testing tree maintainers might not
>>>>> have the required knowledge to be sure a test is correctly implemented).
>>>>>
>>>>> In this particular case I assume you don't have much knowledge of that
>>>>> PPC machine, which is a hobbyist one, but since you are the PPC
>>>>> maintainer, I'd rather see this going via your tree :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex/Cleber/Eduardo, any comment on this position?
>>>>
>>>> Once we have a .travis.yml I'm happy with it can go in via another tree
>>>> no problem. See other thread....
>>>
>>> Good :)
>>>
>>> David can take patches 1-5 (I tagged patch 6 as RFC but messed something
>>> with git-publish and lost it when I sent this series).
>>
>> Ok, I've taken patches 1-5 into my ppc-for-4.2 tree.
> 
> Hrm.  Judging by both the continued comments on this thread, and the
> fact it breaks the travis build, seems like this series needs a little
> more work.  I've pulled it out of ppc-for-4.2 again, and I'll wait for
> the next spin.

OK, sorry :|