[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more automated/public CI for QEMU pullreqs
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: more automated/public CI for QEMU pullreqs |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Oct 2019 10:31:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:53:16PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 11:50, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Thanks for writing up this summary! The requirements and possible
> > solutions are now clear.
> >
> > We need someone willing to set up and maintain the CI.
> >
> > One-off tasks:
> >
> > 1. Create CI runners that offer similar cross-architecture coverage to
> > Peter's current setup. qemu.org has some x86, ppc, and s390 server
> > resources available. I'm not sure about ARM and other architectures.
> >
> > 2. Write CI configuration to run Peter's "make && make check && make
> > check-tcg && linux-user-test".
> >
> > 3. Document the CI on wiki.qemu.org.
> >
> > Ongoing responsibilities:
> >
> > 1. Triage failures that the qemu.git maintainer thinks are related to CI
> > runners.
> >
> > 2. Keep the CI up-to-date and runners online.
> >
> > Any volunteers?
>
> I see this call for volunteers didn't attract any offers :-/
>
> Thread consensus seems to be toward using gitlab CI -- assuming
> we can hand-build the gitlab runner for the architectures
> we need without having to block on gitlab fixing their weird
> "build for all architectures at once" packaging ?
Let's tackle the issue of CI at KVM Forum. The main issue is to get
people.
I will talk to colleagues beforehand to see if anyone is available for
this role.
Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: more automated/public CI for QEMU pullreqs,
Stefan Hajnoczi <=