[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone? |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:57:44 +0100 |
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 10:14, Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > I suppose the same applies to dtc (1.4.2 required by qemu, but xenial
> > has 1.4.0... so we have to wait until April 26, 2020? 18.04 LTS
> > release date + 2y).
>
> Possibly - depends on scope of changes between 1.4.0 & 1.4.2 - maybe it
> is easy to conditionally support 1.4.0 too.
We need fdt_first_subnode() and fdt_next_subnode() which only
came in in 1.4.2.
thanks
-- PMM
- RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Lucien Murray-Pitts, 2019/10/05
- RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Lucien Murray-Pitts, 2019/10/05
- Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Peter Maydell, 2019/10/05
- Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2019/10/15
- Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Thomas Huth, 2019/10/15
- Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2019/10/15
- Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Marc-André Lureau, 2019/10/15
- Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2019/10/15
- Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2019/10/15
Re: RFC: Why dont we move to newer capstone?, Richard Henderson, 2019/10/14