Re: RFC: New device for zero-copy VM memory access

[geoff]

On 2019-11-01 01:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 14:26, <address@hidden> wrote:
> > As the author of Looking Glass, I also have to consider the 
> > maintenance
> > and the complexity of implementing the vhost protocol into the 
> > project.
> > At this time a complete Porthole client can be implemented in 150 
> > lines
> > of C without external dependencies, and most of that is boilerplate
> > socket code. This IMO is a major factor in deciding to avoid 
> > vhost-user.
>
> This is essentially a proposal that we should make our project and
> code more complicated so that your project and code can be simpler.
> I hope you can see why this isn't necessarily an argument that will 
> hold
> very much weight for us :-)

Certainly, I do which is why I am still going to see about using vhost,
however, a device that uses vhost is likely more complex then the device
as it stands right now and as such more maintenance would be involved on
your end also. Or have I missed something in that vhost-user can be used
directly as a device?

> thanks
> -- PMM