qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 07/33] serial: register vmsd with DeviceClass


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/33] serial: register vmsd with DeviceClass
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:54:20 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)

* Marc-André Lureau (address@hidden) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 2:35 PM Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 10:23, Marc-André Lureau
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:22 PM Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > Did you test whether migration still works from a QEMU
> > > > version without this patch to one with it? (The migration
> > >
> > > Yes, I thought I did test correctly, but I realized testing with x86
> > > isn't correct.
> > >
> > > So with arm/musicpal for ex, I can migrate from before->after, however
> > > after->before won't work. Is that ok?
> >
> > Broadly speaking, the only case where we care about not
> > breaking cross-version migration is where we have a versioned
> > machine type. So musicpal doesn't matter too much. Beyond
> > that, yes, generally before->after is more important than
> > after->before. I have a feeling Red Hat downstream cares about
> > after->before migration at least for x86 but you or your colleagues
> > would know that better than me :-)
> >
> > > > vmstate code is too complicated for me to be able to figure
> > > > out whether passing the 'dev' pointer makes a difference
> > > > to whot it names the state sections and whether the
> > > > 'qdev_set_legacy_instance_id' suffices to avoid problems.)
> > >
> > > I don't see a way to fix after->before, because the instance id is
> > > initially 0 with the new code, and the old code expect a different
> > > value.
> >
> > Can you explain how the instance ID stuff works? I was
> > expecting that the result of setting the legacy instance ID
> > would just be that the new version would always have
> > the older setting, so if it works for old->new it would also
> > work for new->old. But as I say I don't understand this bit
> > of the migration code.
> 
> From what I understand, the alias_id is only used in
> savevm.c:find_se(), and thus can only be used to match against
> "legacy" instance id values. On new code, instance_id is generated
> incrementally from 0 with calculate_new_instance_id(), based on
> "qdev-path/vmsd-name".

I think there are cases here there's no qdev path that's viable;
e.g. for ISA devices, the ID is set to the ISA IO base:

hw/char/serial-isa.c
79:    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(dev, isa->iobase, 3);

(In serial_isa_realizefn )

but to be honest I'd have to trace this out and see what values the
devices are actually using to be sure.

(And yes, please don't break backwards migration; otherwise I'll
end up having to figure out a fix).

Dave

> 
> 
> -- 
> Marc-André Lureau
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]