qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] util/cutils: Expand do_strtosz parsing precision t


From: Tao Xu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] util/cutils: Expand do_strtosz parsing precision to 64 bits
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:40:51 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1

On 12/17/2019 7:44 PM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:


On 9 Dec 2019, at 09:30, Tao Xu <address@hidden> wrote:

Parse input string both as a double and as a uint64_t, then use the
method which consumes more characters. Update the related test cases.

Signed-off-by: Tao Xu <address@hidden>
---

Changes in v2:
    - Resend to use double small than DBL_MIN
    - Add more test case for double overflow and underflow.
    - Set mul as int64_t (Markus)
    - Restore endptr (Markus)
---
tests/test-cutils.c    | 37 +++++++----------------
tests/test-keyval.c    | 47 +++++------------------------
tests/test-qemu-opts.c | 39 +++++-------------------
util/cutils.c          | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)

[...]
+    /*
+     * Parse @nptr both as a double and as a uint64_t, then use the method
+     * which consumes more characters.
+     */

Why do ever need to parse as double if you have uint64?


Because we want to keep do_strtosz Compatible with double input (such as 1.5k).
+    retd = qemu_strtod_finite(nptr, &suffixd, &vald);
+    retu = qemu_strtou64(nptr, &suffixu, 0, &valu);
+    use_strtod = strlen(suffixd) < strlen(suffixu);

You could simply compare suffixd and suffixu:

use_strtod = suffixd > suffixu;


Thank you for your suggestion.
+
+    if (use_strtod) {
+        endptr = suffixd;
+        retval = retd;
+    } else {
+        endptr = suffixu;
+        retval = retu;
+    }

-    retval = qemu_strtod_finite(nptr, &endptr, &val);
     if (retval) {
         goto out;
     }
-    fraction = modf(val, &integral);
-    if (fraction != 0) {
-        mul_required = 1;
+    if (use_strtod) {
+        fraction = modf(vald, &integral);
+        if (fraction != 0) {
+            mul_required = 1;
+        }
     }
     c = *endptr;
     mul = suffix_mul(c, unit);
@@ -238,17 +258,30 @@ static int do_strtosz(const char *nptr, const char **end,
         retval = -EINVAL;
         goto out;
     }
-    /*
-     * Values near UINT64_MAX overflow to 2**64 when converting to double
-     * precision.  Compare against the maximum representable double precision
-     * value below 2**64, computed as "the next value after 2**64 (0x1p64) in
-     * the direction of 0".
-     */
-    if ((val * mul > nextafter(0x1p64, 0)) || val < 0) {
-        retval = -ERANGE;
-        goto out;
+
+    if (use_strtod) {
+        /*
+         * Values near UINT64_MAX overflow to 2**64 when converting to double
+         * precision. Compare against the maximum representable double 
precision
+         * value below 2**64, computed as "the next value after 2**64 (0x1p64)
+         * in the direction of 0".
+         */
+        if ((vald * mul > nextafter(0x1p64, 0)) || vald < 0) {
+            retval = -ERANGE;
+            goto out;
+        }
+        *result = vald * mul;
+    } else {
+        /* Reject negative input and overflow output */
+        while (qemu_isspace(*nptr)) {
+            nptr++;
+        }
+        if (*nptr == '-' || UINT64_MAX / mul < valu) {
+            retval = -ERANGE;
+            goto out;
+        }
+        *result = valu * mul;
     }
-    *result = val * mul;
     retval = 0;

out:
--
2.20.1







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]