qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 5/6] hw/scsi/megasas: Silent GCC9 duplicated-cond warning


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] hw/scsi/megasas: Silent GCC9 duplicated-cond warning
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:03:53 -1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2

On 12/17/19 7:34 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> GCC9 is confused when building with CFLAG -O3:
> 
>   hw/scsi/megasas.c: In function ‘megasas_scsi_realize’:
>   hw/scsi/megasas.c:2387:26: error: duplicated ‘if’ condition 
> [-Werror=duplicated-cond]
>    2387 |     } else if (s->fw_sge >= 128 - MFI_PASS_FRAME_SIZE) {
>   hw/scsi/megasas.c:2385:19: note: previously used here
>    2385 |     if (s->fw_sge >= MEGASAS_MAX_SGE - MFI_PASS_FRAME_SIZE) {
>   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> When this device was introduced in commit e8f943c3bcc, the author
> cared about modularity, using a definition for the firmware limit.
> If we modify the limit, the code is valid. Add a check if the
> definition got modified to a bigger limit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> ---
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <address@hidden>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> Cc: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> ---
>  hw/scsi/megasas.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/megasas.c b/hw/scsi/megasas.c
> index de9bd20887..ece1601b66 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/megasas.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/megasas.c
> @@ -2382,7 +2382,8 @@ static void megasas_scsi_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>      if (!s->hba_serial) {
>          s->hba_serial = g_strdup(MEGASAS_HBA_SERIAL);
>      }
> -    if (s->fw_sge >= MEGASAS_MAX_SGE - MFI_PASS_FRAME_SIZE) {
> +    if (MEGASAS_MAX_SGE > 128
> +        && s->fw_sge >= MEGASAS_MAX_SGE - MFI_PASS_FRAME_SIZE) {
>          s->fw_sge = MEGASAS_MAX_SGE - MFI_PASS_FRAME_SIZE;
>      } else if (s->fw_sge >= 128 - MFI_PASS_FRAME_SIZE) {
>          s->fw_sge = 128 - MFI_PASS_FRAME_SIZE;
> 

I'm not keen on this.  It looks to me like the raw 128 case should be removed
-- surely that's the point of the symbolic constant.  But I'll defer if a
maintainer disagrees.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]