[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] migration: Increase default number of multifd chann
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] migration: Increase default number of multifd channels to 16 |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:58:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:01:10AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> We can scale much better with 16, so we can scale to higher numbers.
What was the test scenario showing such scaling ?
In the real world I'm sceptical that virt hosts will have
16 otherwise idle CPU cores available that are permissible
to use for migration, or indeed whether they'll have network
bandwidth available to allow 16 cores to saturate the link.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] migration: Increase default number of multifd channels to 16, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/01/03