[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio: Change order of appling runstate to device and b
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio: Change order of appling runstate to device and bus |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jan 2020 07:43:43 -0500 |
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 03:52:45PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> On transition to running first apply state to bus and then to device
> so device can access bus functions correctly. When going to stopped
> notify device first and then the bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Kuchin <address@hidden>
I kind of like this but this has the potential to break lots of things.
How was this tested?
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 04716b5f6c..2ea2edba10 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -3096,7 +3096,7 @@ static void virtio_vmstate_change(void *opaque, int
> running, RunState state)
> bool backend_run = running && virtio_device_started(vdev, vdev->status);
> vdev->vm_running = running;
>
> - if (backend_run) {
> + if (!backend_run) {
> virtio_set_status(vdev, vdev->status);
> }
>
> @@ -3104,7 +3104,7 @@ static void virtio_vmstate_change(void *opaque, int
> running, RunState state)
> k->vmstate_change(qbus->parent, backend_run);
> }
>
> - if (!backend_run) {
> + if (backend_run) {
> virtio_set_status(vdev, vdev->status);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.20.1
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio: Change order of appling runstate to device and bus,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=