[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications
From: |
John Snow |
Subject: |
Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:42:10 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 |
On 12/24/19 8:00 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Based on experiance in libvirt, this is an even larger job than (4),
> as the feature set here is huge. Much of it directly ties into the
> config problem, as to deal with SELinux / namespace setup the code
> needs to understand what resources to provide access to. This
> requires a way to express 100% coverage of all QEMU configuration
> in use & analyse it to determine what resources it implies. So this
> ties strongly into QAPI-ification completion.
Is it totally bonkers to suggest that QEMU provide a method of digesting
a given configuration and returning a configuration object that a
standalone jailer can use?
So we have a QEMU manager, the generic jailer, and QEMU. QEMU and the
manager cooperate to produce the jailing configuration, and the jailer
does what we ask it to.
Nuts?
--js
- Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications, (continued)
- Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications, Markus Armbruster, 2020/01/25
- Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications, John Snow, 2020/01/24
- Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/01/24
- Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/25
- Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications, Markus Armbruster, 2020/01/24
- Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications, Christophe de Dinechin, 2020/01/25
Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications,
John Snow <=
Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/25