[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip
From: |
Auger Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:42:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
Hi Peter,
On 2/27/20 6:00 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> This is majorly only for X86 because that's the only one that supports
> split irqchip for now.
>
> When the irqchip is split, we face a dilemma that KVM irqfd will be
> enabled, however the slow irqchip is still running in the userspace.
> It means that the resamplefd in the kernel irqfds won't take any
> effect and it can miss to ack INTx interrupts on EOIs.
Won't it always fail to ack INTx? With the above sentence I understand
it can work sometimes?
>
> One example is split irqchip with VFIO INTx, which will break if we
> use the VFIO INTx fast path.
>
> This patch can potentially supports the VFIO fast path again for INTx,
> that the IRQ delivery will still use the fast path, while we don't
> need to trap MMIOs in QEMU for the device to emulate the EIOs (see the
> callers of vfio_eoi() hook). However the EOI of the INTx will still
> need to be done from the userspace by caching all the resamplefds in
> QEMU and kick properly for IOAPIC EOI broadcast.
If I understand correctly this is a one way fast path? Fast path is on
the trigger side only: VFIO -> KVM but not on the deactivation side,
trapped by the userspace IOAPIC where you directly notify the UNMASK
eventfd from userspace. Is that correct?
>
> When the userspace is responsible for the resamplefd kickup, don't
> register it on the kvm_irqfd anymore, because on newer kernels (after
> commit 654f1f13ea56, 5.2+) the KVM_IRQFD will fail if with both split
> irqchip and resamplefd. This will make sure that the fast path will
> work for all supported kernels.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10738541/#22609933
>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> ---
> v1.1 changelog:
> - when resamplefd is going to be kicked from userspace, don't register
> it again in KVM_IRQFD. Tested against upstream kernel.
>
> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> accel/kvm/trace-events | 1 +
> hw/intc/ioapic.c | 11 +++++--
> include/sysemu/kvm.h | 4 +++
> 4 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> index d49b74512a..b766b6e93c 100644
> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> @@ -159,9 +159,62 @@ static const KVMCapabilityInfo
> kvm_required_capabilites[] = {
> static NotifierList kvm_irqchip_change_notifiers =
> NOTIFIER_LIST_INITIALIZER(kvm_irqchip_change_notifiers);
>
> +struct KVMResampleFd {
> + int gsi;
> + EventNotifier *resample_event;
> + QLIST_ENTRY(KVMResampleFd) node;
> +};
> +typedef struct KVMResampleFd KVMResampleFd;
> +
> +/*
> + * Only used with split irqchip where we need to do the resample fd
> + * kick for the kernel from userspace.
> + */
> +static QLIST_HEAD(, KVMResampleFd) kvm_resample_fd_list =
> + QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(kvm_resample_fd_list);
> +
> #define kvm_slots_lock(kml) qemu_mutex_lock(&(kml)->slots_lock)
> #define kvm_slots_unlock(kml) qemu_mutex_unlock(&(kml)->slots_lock)
>
> +static inline void kvm_resample_fd_remove(int gsi)
> +{
> + KVMResampleFd *rfd;
> +
> + QLIST_FOREACH(rfd, &kvm_resample_fd_list, node) {
> + if (rfd->gsi == gsi) {
> + QLIST_REMOVE(rfd, node);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kvm_resample_fd_insert(int gsi, EventNotifier *event)
> +{
> + KVMResampleFd *rfd = g_new0(KVMResampleFd, 1);
> +
> + rfd->gsi = gsi;
> + rfd->resample_event = event;
> +
> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&kvm_resample_fd_list, rfd, node);
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_resample_fd_notify(int gsi)
> +{
> + KVMResampleFd *rfd;
> +
> + if (!kvm_irqchip_is_split()) {
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + QLIST_FOREACH(rfd, &kvm_resample_fd_list, node) {
> + if (rfd->gsi == gsi) {
> + event_notifier_set(rfd->resample_event);
> + trace_kvm_resample_fd_notify(gsi);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> int kvm_get_max_memslots(void)
> {
> KVMState *s = KVM_STATE(current_accel());
> @@ -1642,8 +1695,25 @@ static int kvm_irqchip_assign_irqfd(KVMState *s,
> EventNotifier *event,
> };
>
> if (rfd != -1) {
> - irqfd.flags |= KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE;
> - irqfd.resamplefd = rfd;
> + assert(assign);
> + if (kvm_irqchip_is_split()) {
> + /*
> + * When the slow irqchip (e.g. IOAPIC) is in the
> + * userspace, resamplefd will not work because the EOI of
> + * the interrupt will be delivered to userspace instead,
s/delivered to userspace/handled in userspace
> + * the KVM resample fd kick is skipped. The userspace
> + * needs to remember the resamplefd and kick it when we
> + * receive EOI of this IRQ.
Practically we now talk about a VFIO ACTION_UNMASK classical eventfd
As such isn't it a bit weird to handle those normal UNMASK eventfds in
the KVM code?
> + */
> + kvm_resample_fd_insert(virq, resample);
> + } else {
> + irqfd.flags |= KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE;
> + irqfd.resamplefd = rfd;
> + }
> + } else if (!assign) {
> + if (kvm_irqchip_is_split()) {
> + kvm_resample_fd_remove(virq);
> + }
> }
>
> if (!kvm_irqfds_enabled()) {
> diff --git a/accel/kvm/trace-events b/accel/kvm/trace-events
> index 4fb6e59d19..a68eb66534 100644
> --- a/accel/kvm/trace-events
> +++ b/accel/kvm/trace-events
> @@ -16,4 +16,5 @@ kvm_set_ioeventfd_mmio(int fd, uint64_t addr, uint32_t val,
> bool assign, uint32_
> kvm_set_ioeventfd_pio(int fd, uint16_t addr, uint32_t val, bool assign,
> uint32_t size, bool datamatch) "fd: %d @0x%x val=0x%x assign: %d size: %d
> match: %d"
> kvm_set_user_memory(uint32_t slot, uint32_t flags, uint64_t guest_phys_addr,
> uint64_t memory_size, uint64_t userspace_addr, int ret) "Slot#%d flags=0x%x
> gpa=0x%"PRIx64 " size=0x%"PRIx64 " ua=0x%"PRIx64 " ret=%d"
> kvm_clear_dirty_log(uint32_t slot, uint64_t start, uint32_t size)
> "slot#%"PRId32" start 0x%"PRIx64" size 0x%"PRIx32
> +kvm_resample_fd_notify(int gsi) "gsi %d"
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/ioapic.c b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> index 15747fe2c2..8c75465c62 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> @@ -236,8 +236,15 @@ void ioapic_eoi_broadcast(int vector)
> for (n = 0; n < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; n++) {
> entry = s->ioredtbl[n];
>
> - if ((entry & IOAPIC_VECTOR_MASK) != vector ||
> - ((entry >> IOAPIC_LVT_TRIGGER_MODE_SHIFT) & 1) !=
> IOAPIC_TRIGGER_LEVEL) {
> + if ((entry & IOAPIC_VECTOR_MASK) != vector) {
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Kick resamplefd if KVM is bypassed */
> + kvm_resample_fd_notify(n);
KVM is bypassed on the deactivation path but still we call
kvm_resample_fd_notify().
> +
> + if (((entry >> IOAPIC_LVT_TRIGGER_MODE_SHIFT) & 1) !=
> + IOAPIC_TRIGGER_LEVEL) {
> continue;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index 141342de98..b67552c047 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -555,4 +555,8 @@ int kvm_set_one_reg(CPUState *cs, uint64_t id, void
> *source);
> int kvm_get_one_reg(CPUState *cs, uint64_t id, void *target);
> struct ppc_radix_page_info *kvm_get_radix_page_info(void);
> int kvm_get_max_memslots(void);
> +
> +/* Notify resamplefd for EOI of specific level triggered interrupts */
> +void kvm_resample_fd_notify(int gsi);
> +
> #endif
>
Thanks
Eric
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] vfio/pci: Disable INTx fast path if using split irqchip, (continued)
- [PATCH 2/5] vfio/pci: Use kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier_gsi() for irqfds, Peter Xu, 2020/02/26
- [PATCH 3/5] KVM: Pass EventNotifier into kvm_irqchip_assign_irqfd, Peter Xu, 2020/02/26
- [PATCH 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Peter Xu, 2020/02/26
- [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Peter Xu, 2020/02/27
- Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Peter Xu, 2020/02/27
- Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip,
Auger Eric <=
- Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Peter Xu, 2020/02/27
- Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Auger Eric, 2020/02/27
- Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Peter Xu, 2020/02/27
- Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Auger Eric, 2020/02/27
- Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Peter Xu, 2020/02/27
- Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/02/28
- Re: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Auger Eric, 2020/02/28
Re: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: Kick resamplefd for split kernel irqchip, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/02/28