[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 32/33] docs: Remove old texinfo sources
|
From: |
Kashyap Chamarthy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 32/33] docs: Remove old texinfo sources |
|
Date: |
Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:42:29 +0100 |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:36:18PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We can now delete the old .texi files, which we have been keeping in
> the tree as a parallel set of documentation to the new rST sources.
> The only remaining use of Texinfo is the autogenerated manuals
> and HTML documents created from the QAPI JSON doc comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 5 +-
> docs/system/build-platforms.texi | 67 ----
> docs/system/cpu-models-mips.texi | 157 ----------
> docs/system/cpu-models-x86.texi | 482 -----------------------------
> docs/system/deprecated.texi | 377 ----------------------
> docs/system/gdb.texi | 71 -----
> docs/system/images.texi | 88 ------
> docs/system/invocation.texi | 240 --------------
> docs/system/ivshmem.texi | 60 ----
> docs/system/keys.texi | 43 ---
> docs/system/license.texi | 9 -
> docs/system/linuxboot.texi | 27 --
> docs/system/managed-startup.texi | 35 ---
> docs/system/monitor.texi | 34 --
> docs/system/mux-chardev.texi | 44 ---
> docs/system/net.texi | 96 ------
> docs/system/qemu-option-trace.texi | 28 --
> docs/system/quickstart.texi | 12 -
> docs/system/security.texi | 167 ----------
> docs/system/target-arm.texi | 245 ---------------
> docs/system/target-i386.texi | 91 ------
> docs/system/target-m68k.texi | 25 --
> docs/system/target-mips.texi | 150 ---------
> docs/system/target-ppc.texi | 52 ----
> docs/system/target-sparc.texi | 68 ----
> docs/system/target-sparc64.texi | 38 ---
> docs/system/target-xtensa.texi | 35 ---
> docs/system/tls.texi | 329 --------------------
> docs/system/usb.texi | 115 -------
> docs/system/vnc-security.texi | 196 ------------
> qemu-doc.texi | 201 ------------
> 31 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3586 deletions(-)
Nice diff-stat; "negative code" for the win! :-)
(Yes, yes, we do add them back in a different form elsewhere...)
Reviewed-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <address@hidden>
[...]
--
/kashyap