[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Further bitmaps improvements

From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Further bitmaps improvements
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:55:03 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

On 11.03.20 07:17, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 10.03.2020 20:17, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 06.03.20 08:45, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 26.02.2020 16:13, Max Reitz wrote:
>>>> On 05.02.20 12:20, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>> The main feature here is improvement of _next_dirty_area API, which
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> going to use then for backup / block-copy.
>>>>> Somehow, I thought that it was merged, but seems I even forgot to send
>>>>> v4.
>>>> The changes from v3 look good to me, but I’d prefer a review from Eric
>>>> on patch 8.
>>> Hi!
>>> Could you take it now, or do you prefer me to resend?
>> I understand that you agreed to drop the comment above
>> bd_extent_array_convert_to_be(), then do the
>> “s/further call/so further calls/” replacement, and finally replace the
>> whole four lines Eric has quoted by “(this ensures that after a failure,
>> no further extents can accidentally change the bounds of the last extent
>> in the array)”?
> Yes, all true.

Hm, I could take it then, but on second thought, John is the maintainer
for 8/10 patches, and Eric is for the other two...  So I’m not sure
whether I’m even the right person to do so.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]