On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 9:21 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:02:38AM +0200, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> > > +#define virtio_net_config virtio_net_config_with_rss
> > Do we have to? Let's just tweak code to do the right thing...
> > Are we going to update the virtio_net some time?
> > If yes, IMO makes sense to do less tweaking in the middle of the code.
> > Then, upon update of virtio_net.h - easily remove all these defines that
> > added in virtio-net.c
> We'll update it in a month or two. But I'd be reluctant to merge hacks
> since people tend to copy-paste code ...
> I agree that merging hacks is very bad practice.
> Which change is more looks like a hack: redefine the struct to its _real_
> layout or change the type of the struct in 5 places?
Anything that would be unacceptable as a permanent solution is a hack.
In this case how about
struct virtio_net_config config;
/* RSS things */
'#define virtio_net_config virtio_net_config_with_rss ' is OK?