[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:00:48 +0000 |
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 14:57, Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't feel like -Wno-unused-function looses anything significant, as
> the GCC builds will still be reporting unused functions which will
> catch majority of cases.
The most interesting difference is that clang will catch unused
static inline functions which gcc does not.
thanks
-- PMM
- [PULL 04/10] hbitmap: drop meta bitmaps as they are unused, (continued)
- [PULL 04/10] hbitmap: drop meta bitmaps as they are unused, John Snow, 2020/03/17
- [PULL 05/10] block/dirty-bitmap: switch _next_dirty_area and _next_zero to int64_t, John Snow, 2020/03/17
- [PULL 06/10] block/dirty-bitmap: add _next_dirty API, John Snow, 2020/03/17
- [PULL 07/10] block/dirty-bitmap: improve _next_dirty_area API, John Snow, 2020/03/17
- [PULL 08/10] nbd/server: introduce NBDExtentArray, John Snow, 2020/03/17
- [PULL 09/10] nbd/server: use bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area, John Snow, 2020/03/17
- [PULL 10/10] block/qcow2-bitmap: use bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty, John Snow, 2020/03/17
- Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches, Peter Maydell, 2020/03/17
- Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches, Eric Blake, 2020/03/17
- Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/03/17
- Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/03/17
- Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches, Peter Maydell, 2020/03/17
- Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/03/17
- Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches, Eric Blake, 2020/03/17
Re: [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches, Eric Blake, 2020/03/18