[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Mar 2020 21:33:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 |
Le 18/03/2020 à 20:46, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 3/18/20 6:57 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> My set of "run ls for various architectures" linux-user tests
>> https://people.linaro.org/~peter.maydell/linux-user-test-pmm-20200114.tgz
>> fails with this pullreq:
>>
>> e104462:bionic:linux-user-test-0.3$
>> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/build/all-linux-static/x86_64-linux-user/qemu-x86_64
>> -L ./gnemul/qemu-x86_64 x86_64/ls -l dummyfile
>> qemu: 0x40008117e9: unhandled CPU exception 0x101 - aborting
>
>
> I replicated this on aarch64 host, with an existing build tree and merging in
> the pull request. It does not occur when building the same merged tree from
> scratch.
>
> I have no idea what the reason for this is. Laurent suggested a file in the
> build tree that is shadowed by one in the source tree, but to me that makes no
> sense for this case:
>
> It's target/i386/cpu.h that defines EXCP_SYSCALL (renumbered in this series
> from 0x100 to 0x101), which is not in the build tree. It is
> linux-user/i386/cpu_loop.c that consumes EXCP_SYSCALL, and it is also not in
> the build tree.
>
> However, from the error message above, it's clear that cpu_loop.o has not been
> rebuilt properly.
>
I removed this series from the final pull request as the problem doesn't
seem related to change I made in configure.
I didn't find from where the problem comes.
Could you check if you are always able to reproduce the problem with master?
Thanks,
Laurent
- [PULL v2 35/37] linux-user, aarch64: sync syscall numbers with kernel v5.5, (continued)
- [PULL v2 35/37] linux-user, aarch64: sync syscall numbers with kernel v5.5, Laurent Vivier, 2020/03/17
- [PULL v2 34/37] scripts: add a script to generate syscall_nr.h, Laurent Vivier, 2020/03/17
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches, Peter Maydell, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches, Laurent Vivier, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches, Richard Henderson, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches, Laurent Vivier, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches, Richard Henderson, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches, Laurent Vivier, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches, Richard Henderson, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches, Laurent Vivier, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches,
Laurent Vivier <=
- Re: [PULL v2 00/37] Linux user for 5.0 patches, Richard Henderson, 2020/03/23