[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] target/arm: kvm: Handle potential issue with dabt inj
|
From: |
Beata Michalska |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] target/arm: kvm: Handle potential issue with dabt injection |
|
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:16:48 +0000 |
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 18:44, Richard Henderson
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 3/23/20 4:32 AM, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > uint8_t ext_dabt_pending; /* Request for injecting ext DABT */
> > + uint8_t ext_dabt_raised; /* Tracking/verifying injection of ext DABT */
>
> Is there a reason these are uint8_t and not bool?
>
>
The ext_dabt_pending is reflecting the KVM type.
The ext_dabt_raised is following that one.
BR
Beata
> r~