qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add stsi 3.2.2 tests


From: Janosch Frank
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add stsi 3.2.2 tests
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:29:15 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2

On 3/31/20 10:24 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 31.03.20 09:14, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Subcode 3.2.2 is handled by KVM/QEMU and should therefore be tested
>> a bit more thorough.
>>
>> In this test we set a custom name and uuid through the QEMU command
>> line. Both parameters will be passed to the guest on a stsi subcode
>> 3.2.2 call and will then be checked.
>>
>> We also compare the configured cpu numbers against the smp reported
>> numbers and if the reserved + configured add up to the total number
>> reported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>
>> * Tabify on struct
>> * Moved prefix_push up a bit
>> * Replaced returns with goto out to pop prefix
>>
>> ---
>>  s390x/stsi.c        | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  s390x/unittests.cfg |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/s390x/stsi.c b/s390x/stsi.c
>> index e9206bca137d2edb..17ad33eefb9c948a 100644
>> --- a/s390x/stsi.c
>> +++ b/s390x/stsi.c
>> @@ -14,7 +14,28 @@
>>  #include <asm/page.h>
>>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>>  #include <asm/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <smp.h>
>>  
>> +struct stsi_322 {
>> +    uint8_t reserved[31];
>> +    uint8_t count;
>> +    struct {
>> +    uint8_t reserved2[4];
>> +    uint16_t total_cpus;
>> +    uint16_t conf_cpus;
>> +    uint16_t standby_cpus;
>> +    uint16_t reserved_cpus;
>> +    uint8_t name[8];
>> +    uint32_t caf;
>> +    uint8_t cpi[16];
>> +    uint8_t reserved5[3];
>> +    uint8_t ext_name_encoding;
>> +    uint32_t reserved3;
>> +    uint8_t uuid[16];
>> +    } vm[8];
>> +    uint8_t reserved4[1504];
>> +    uint8_t ext_names[8][256];
> 
> Sorry, still no proper use of tabs. (can fixup if you agree)
> 
Sure, go ahead


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]