qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-5.0 v2 3/3] block: Fix blk->in_flight during blk_wait_whi


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.0 v2 3/3] block: Fix blk->in_flight during blk_wait_while_drained()
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 09:52:32 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1

06.04.2020 20:14, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Waiting in blk_wait_while_drained() while blk->in_flight is increased
for the current request is wrong because it will cause the drain
operation to deadlock.

This patch makes sure that blk_wait_while_drained() is called with
blk->in_flight increased exactly once for the current request, and that
it temporarily decreases the counter while it waits.

Fixes: cf3129323f900ef5ddbccbe86e4fa801e88c566e
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
---
  block/block-backend.c | 17 +++++------------
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c
index d330e08b05..f621435f0b 100644
--- a/block/block-backend.c
+++ b/block/block-backend.c
@@ -1140,10 +1140,15 @@ static int blk_check_byte_request(BlockBackend *blk, 
int64_t offset,
      return 0;
  }
+/* To be called between exactly one pair of blk_inc/dec_in_flight() */
  static void coroutine_fn blk_wait_while_drained(BlockBackend *blk)
  {
+    assert(blk->in_flight > 0);

Hmm. You promise to make sure that in_flight increased exactly once. Shouldn't it 
be assert(blk->in_flight == 1) ?

+
      if (blk->quiesce_counter && !blk->disable_request_queuing) {
+        blk_dec_in_flight(blk);
          qemu_co_queue_wait(&blk->queued_requests, NULL);
+        blk_inc_in_flight(blk);
      }
  }
@@ -1416,12 +1421,6 @@ static void blk_aio_read_entry(void *opaque)
      BlkRwCo *rwco = &acb->rwco;
      QEMUIOVector *qiov = rwco->iobuf;
- if (rwco->blk->quiesce_counter) {
-        blk_dec_in_flight(rwco->blk);
-        blk_wait_while_drained(rwco->blk);
-        blk_inc_in_flight(rwco->blk);
-    }

Hm, you drop it as it's called from blk_do_preadv too. I think it worth 
mentioning in commit message still.

-
      assert(qiov->size == acb->bytes);
      rwco->ret = blk_do_preadv(rwco->blk, rwco->offset, acb->bytes,
                                qiov, rwco->flags);
@@ -1434,12 +1433,6 @@ static void blk_aio_write_entry(void *opaque)
      BlkRwCo *rwco = &acb->rwco;
      QEMUIOVector *qiov = rwco->iobuf;
- if (rwco->blk->quiesce_counter) {
-        blk_dec_in_flight(rwco->blk);
-        blk_wait_while_drained(rwco->blk);
-        blk_inc_in_flight(rwco->blk);
-    }
-
      assert(!qiov || qiov->size == acb->bytes);
      rwco->ret = blk_do_pwritev_part(rwco->blk, rwco->offset, acb->bytes,
                                      qiov, 0, rwco->flags);


With assert(blk->in_flight == 1) and mention extra wait removing in commit 
message:
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>


And still, if my suggestion in previous patch works, we may fix it all without 
extra blk_dec/blk_inc pair, by just moving blk_inc_ after 
blk_wait_while_drained in my previous suggestion.. It looks more native for me 
(but may be I miss something?):


@@ -1154,6 +1154,7 @@ int coroutine_fn blk_co_preadv(BlockBackend *blk, int64_t 
offset,
     int ret;
     BlockDriverState *bs;

     blk_wait_while_drained(blk);
+    blk_inc_in_flight(blk);

     /* Call blk_bs() only after waiting, the graph may have changed */
@@ -1175,6 +1176,7 @@ int coroutine_fn blk_co_preadv(BlockBackend *blk, int64_t 
offset,

     ret = bdrv_co_preadv(blk->root, offset, bytes, qiov, flags);
     bdrv_dec_in_flight(bs);
+    blk_dec_in_flight(blk);
     return ret;
 }

@@ -1337,7 +1339,6 @@ static void blk_aio_complete(BlkAioEmAIOCB *acb)
 {
     if (acb->has_returned) {
         acb->common.cb(acb->common.opaque, acb->rwco.ret);
-        blk_dec_in_flight(acb->rwco.blk);
         qemu_aio_unref(acb);
     }
 }
@@ -1357,7 +1358,6 @@ static BlockAIOCB *blk_aio_prwv(BlockBackend *blk, 
int64_t offset, int bytes,
     BlkAioEmAIOCB *acb;
     Coroutine *co;

-    blk_inc_in_flight(blk);
     acb = blk_aio_get(&blk_aio_em_aiocb_info, blk, cb, opaque);
     acb->rwco = (BlkRwCo) {
         .blk    = blk,
@@ -1388,9 +1388,7 @@ static void blk_aio_read_entry(void *opaque)
     QEMUIOVector *qiov = rwco->iobuf;

     if (rwco->blk->quiesce_counter) {
-        blk_dec_in_flight(rwco->blk);
         blk_wait_while_drained(rwco->blk);
-        blk_inc_in_flight(rwco->blk);
     }

     assert(qiov->size == acb->bytes);


(and same for write, ioctl, flush, discard)

--
Best regards,
Vladimir



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]