[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] block: Add flags to BlockDriver.bdrv_co_truncate()
From: |
Max Reitz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] block: Add flags to BlockDriver.bdrv_co_truncate() |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:41:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 |
On 22.04.20 17:21, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> This adds a new BdrvRequestFlags parameter to the .bdrv_co_truncate()
> driver callbacks, and a supported_truncate_flags field in
> BlockDriverState that allows drivers to advertise support for request
> flags in the context of truncate.
>
> For now, we always pass 0 and no drivers declare support for any flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/block/block_int.h | 10 +++++++++-
> block/crypto.c | 3 ++-
> block/file-posix.c | 2 +-
> block/file-win32.c | 2 +-
> block/gluster.c | 1 +
> block/io.c | 8 +++++++-
> block/iscsi.c | 2 +-
> block/nfs.c | 3 ++-
> block/qcow2.c | 2 +-
> block/qed.c | 1 +
> block/raw-format.c | 2 +-
> block/rbd.c | 1 +
> block/sheepdog.c | 4 ++--
> block/ssh.c | 2 +-
> tests/test-block-iothread.c | 3 ++-
> 15 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
(I know I haven’t complained before, so *shrug*, but I wonder now
whether it actually makes sense to have the same BdrvRequestFlags for
all request types. Or why we have the same flags type for read, write,
and zero-write already.)
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] qcow2: Support BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE for truncate, Max Reitz, 2020/04/23