[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 0/3] fuzz: Probably there is a better way to do this
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
[PATCH 0/3] fuzz: Probably there is a better way to do this |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2020 09:11:39 +0200 |
... the comment next to qos_set_machines_devices_available() wonders.
Yup, there is!
Markus Armbruster (3):
Makefile: Drop unused, broken target recurse-fuzz
fuzz: Simplify how we compute available machines and types
libqos: Give get_machine_allocator() internal linkage
Makefile | 1 -
tests/qtest/libqos/qos_external.h | 10 +++--
tests/qtest/fuzz/qos_fuzz.c | 34 ++++-----------
tests/qtest/libqos/qos_external.c | 72 +++++++++++--------------------
tests/qtest/qos-test.c | 29 +++++++++----
5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
--
2.21.1
- [PATCH 0/3] fuzz: Probably there is a better way to do this,
Markus Armbruster <=