qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] plugins: new lockstep plugin for debugging TCG change


From: no-reply
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] plugins: new lockstep plugin for debugging TCG changes
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:20:15 -0700 (PDT)

Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/address@hidden/



Hi,

This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:

Message-id: address@hidden
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] plugins: new lockstep plugin for debugging TCG changes
Type: series

=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0
git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
git config --local diff.renames True
git config --local diff.algorithm histogram
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base..
=== TEST SCRIPT END ===

Switched to a new branch 'test'
0f98ef2 plugins: new lockstep plugin for debugging TCG changes

=== OUTPUT BEGIN ===
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#54: 
new file mode 100644

WARNING: line over 80 characters
#175: FILE: tests/plugin/lockstep.c:117:
+    g_string_append_printf(out, "We are  @ %#016lx vs %#016lx\n", us->pc, 
them->pc);

WARNING: line over 80 characters
#179: FILE: tests/plugin/lockstep.c:121:
+        g_string_append_printf(out, "  previously @ %#016lx/%ld (%ld insn, %ld 
blocks)\n",

ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
#259: FILE: tests/plugin/lockstep.c:201:
+    // save a reference so we can free later

total: 1 errors, 3 warnings, 322 lines checked

Commit 0f98ef2b5ce2 (plugins: new lockstep plugin for debugging TCG changes) 
has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
=== OUTPUT END ===

Test command exited with code: 1


The full log is available at
http://patchew.org/logs/address@hidden/testing.checkpatch/?type=message.
---
Email generated automatically by Patchew [https://patchew.org/].
Please send your feedback to address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]