qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Add RX hardware emulation


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Add RX hardware emulation
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:04:22 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

Hi Yoshinori,

On 6/1/20 4:32 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 01:45:47 +0900,
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>
>> On 5/31/20 6:24 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> This series add to hardware emulation module for RX target.
>>>
>>> Details below.
>>> Interrupt controller, 8bit timer, 16bit comapare match timer and
>>> SCI is RX62N integrated peripheral.
>>> rx-virt - RX62N MCU and external RAM. It like gdb simulator.
>>>
>>> The compare match timer has a CPU interface similar to the SH4 timer.
>>> sh_timer will be deprecated and integrated into this module.
>>> SCI is also implemented in sh_serial, but the functionality is omitted.
>>> I implemented the complete one as renesas_sci.
>>>
>>> git repository here.
>>> git://git.pf.osdn.net/gitroot/y/ys/ysato/qemu.git tags/hw-rx-20200601
>>
>> Sigh. It is a bit unfortunate and demotivating that we can not
>> coordinate this. I was going to send a pre-merge for this today.
>>
>> What is positive is you unified some SH4/RX peripherals.
>>
>> I'll try to merge both series. If it takes too long, I might send my
>> current queue for you to review, then go back to this one you just sent.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Phil.
>>
> 
> Oh. Sorry.
> 
> The old code had some spec differences.
> I have fixed those mistakes here.

Yes, I am glad to see how it evolved, in particular how you merged the
SH4/RX common peripherals :)

> 
> I would like to merge this if possible.

I posted the v33 of your v32:
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg708317.html

As it is mostly reviewed and tested, it seems more reasonable to merge
what is reviewed, and then apply your latest patches on top. It took us
already a long time to get there, and I'd not start again to review 30
more times this version.

I believe if would be easier this way, you review/ack the v33 and we get
the peripheral cleanup on top. My 2 cents, feel free to disagree and
insist on restarting the whole review process.

Regards,

Phil.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]