qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH v13 1/5] i386: Add support for CPUID_8000_001E for AMD


From: Babu Moger
Subject: RE: [PATCH v13 1/5] i386: Add support for CPUID_8000_001E for AMD
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:21:14 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 3:54 PM
> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
> Cc: mst@redhat.com; marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com; pbonzini@redhat.com;
> rth@twiddle.net; mtosatti@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> kvm@vger.kernel.org; kash@tripleback.net; geoff@hostfission.com; Dr. David
> Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/5] i386: Add support for CPUID_8000_001E for AMD
> 
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:06:27AM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 12:52 PM
> > > To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
> > > Cc: mst@redhat.com; marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com;
> pbonzini@redhat.com;
> > > rth@twiddle.net; mtosatti@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> > > kvm@vger.kernel.org; kash@tripleback.net; geoff@hostfission.com; Dr.
> David
> > > Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/5] i386: Add support for CPUID_8000_001E for
> AMD
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 06:56:17PM -0400, Babu Moger wrote:
> > > > Add support for cpuid leaf CPUID_8000_001E. Build the config that 
> > > > closely
> > > > match the underlying hardware. Please refer to the Processor
> Programming
> > > > Reference (PPR) for AMD Family 17h Model for more details.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> > > [...]
> > > > +    case 0x8000001E:
> > > > +        assert(cpu->core_id <= 255);
> > >
> > > It is possible to trigger this assert using:
> > >
> > > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -machine q35,accel=kvm,kernel-irqchip=split -device
> > > intel-iommu,intremap=on,eim=on -smp
> > > 1,maxcpus=258,cores=258,threads=1,sockets=1 -cpu
> > > qemu64,xlevel=0x8000001e -device qemu64-x86_64-cpu,apic-id=257
> > > qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Number of hotpluggable cpus requested
> (258)
> > > exceeds the recommended cpus supported by KVM (240)
> > > qemu-system-x86_64:
> > > /home/ehabkost/rh/proj/virt/qemu/target/i386/cpu.c:5888: cpu_x86_cpuid:
> > > Assertion `cpu->core_id <= 255' failed.
> > > Aborted (core dumped)
> > >
> > > See bug report and discussion at
> > >
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.
> > >
> redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1834200&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cbabu.
> > >
> moger%40amd.com%7C8a2724729b914bc9b53d08d8071db392%7C3dd8961fe4
> > >
> 884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637267171438806408&amp;sdata=ib
> > > iGlF%2FF%2FVtYQLf7fe988kxFsLhj4GrRiTOq4LUuOT8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > >
> > > Also, it looks like encode_topo_cpuid8000001e() assumes core_id
> > > has only 3 bits, so the existing assert() is not even sufficient.
> > > We need to decide what to do if the user requests nr_cores > 8.
> > >
> > > Probably omitting CPUID[0x8000001E] if the VCPU topology is
> > > incompatible with encode_topo_cpuid8000001e() (and printing a
> > > warning) is the safest thing to do right now.
> >
> > Eduardo,  We need to generalize the encode_topo_cpuid8000001e decoding.
> > We will have to remove 3 bit limitation there. It will not scale with
> > latest configurations. I will take a look that.
> >
> > For now, best option I think is to(like you mentioned in bug 1834200),
> > declaring nr_cores > 256 as never supported (or deprecated); and throw
> > warning.
> >
> > What do you think?
> 
> I believe we can declare nr_cores > 256 as never supported to
> address the assert failure.  Other CPUID functions also look
> broken when nr_cores is too large: encode_cache_cpuid4() seems to
> assume nr_cores is 128 or less.

Let me know where to add this check. Or if you want to take care of that
that is fine as well.

> But we still need to make nr_cores > 8 safe while
> encode_topo_cpuid8000001e() is not generalized yet.

I am working on a patch to address this now. Will send it soon with other
patches(addressing uninitialized node_id).

> 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > +        encode_topo_cpuid8000001e(cs, cpu,
> > > > +                                  eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> > > > +        break;
> > > >      case 0xC0000000:
> > > >          *eax = env->cpuid_xlevel2;
> > > >          *ebx = 0;
> > > > --
> > > > 1.8.3.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eduardo
> >
> 
> --
> Eduardo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]