[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim: Add assertion to silent GCC warning
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
[PATCH] hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim: Add assertion to silent GCC warning |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:14:09 +0200 |
When compiling with GCC 10 (Fedora 32) using CFLAGS=-O2 we get:
CC or1k-softmmu/hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim.o
hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim.c: In function ‘openrisc_sim_init’:
hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim.c:87:42: error: ‘cpu_irqs[0]’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
87 | sysbus_connect_irq(s, i, cpu_irqs[i][irq_pin]);
| ~~~~~~~~^~~
While humans can tell smp_cpus will always be in the [1, 2] range,
(openrisc_sim_machine_init sets mc->max_cpus = 2), the compiler
can't.
Add an assertion to give the compiler a hint there's no use of
uninitialized data.
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1874073
Reported-by: Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz>
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim.c b/hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim.c
index d08ce61811..02f5259e5e 100644
--- a/hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim.c
+++ b/hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim.c
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static void openrisc_sim_init(MachineState *machine)
int n;
unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->smp.cpus;
+ assert(smp_cpus >= 1 && smp_cpus <= 2);
for (n = 0; n < smp_cpus; n++) {
cpu = OPENRISC_CPU(cpu_create(machine->cpu_type));
if (cpu == NULL) {
--
2.21.3
- [PATCH] hw/openrisc/openrisc_sim: Add assertion to silent GCC warning,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=