qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] pc-bios: s390x: Cleanup part 1


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] pc-bios: s390x: Cleanup part 1
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:44:06 +0200

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 03:52:14 -0400
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> The bios is in dire need for a cleanup as there are still a lot of
> magic constants being used throughout as well as duplicated code.
> 
> In the first part of this series we consolidate constants and
> functions, as well as doing some minor cleanups and fixes.
> 
> The patches are available here:
> https://github.com/frankjaa/qemu/pull/new/cleanup_bios
> 
> v5:
>       * Fixed whitespace damage
>       * Removed reset PSW mask changes in dasd-ipl.c
>       * Added jump2ipl.c cleanup patches
> 
> v4:
>       * Renamed time.h to s390-time.h
>       * Fixed function names in sleep()
>       * Changed order of sense_id_ccw initialization
>       * Added missing include before sleep()
> 
> v3:
>       * Dropped 0x00 to 0x0/0 patch
>       * Moved some timing functions into helper.h instead of time.h
>       * Fixed IPL psw manipulation in dasd-ipl.c
>       * Minor cosmetic fixes found by review
> 
> v2:
>       * Included cio fixup to get rid of compile errors...
>       * Minor cosmetic fixes found by review
> 
> 
> Janosch Frank (12):
>   pc-bios: s390x: cio.c cleanup and compile fix
>   pc-bios: s390x: Consolidate timing functions into time.h
>   pc-bios: s390x: Move sleep and yield to helper.h
>   pc-bios: s390x: Get rid of magic offsets into the lowcore
>   pc-bios: s390x: Remove unneeded dasd-ipl.c reset psw mask changes
>   pc-bios: s390x: Rename PSW_MASK_ZMODE to PSW_MASK_64
>   pc-bios: s390x: Use PSW masks where possible and introduce
>     PSW_MASK_SHORT_ADDR
>   pc-bios: s390x: Move panic() into header and add infinite loop
>   pc-bios: s390x: Use ebcdic2ascii table
>   pc-bios: s390x: Make u32 ptr check explicit
>   pc-bios: s390x: Fix bootmap.c passing PSWs as addresses
>   pc-bios: s390x: Cleanup jump to ipl code
> 
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c     |  9 ++++----
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.h     |  2 +-
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.c         | 40 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h         | 17 ++++++++++-----
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c    |  3 ---
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/helper.h      | 19 +++++++++++++++-
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c    | 35 ++++++++++++-----------------
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c        | 15 +++----------
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c        |  1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/netmain.c     | 23 +++----------------
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h   |  4 +++-
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h    | 27 ++++++-----------------
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-time.h   | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/start.S       |  5 +++--
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c  |  2 ++
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-scsi.c |  2 ++
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c      | 18 +++------------
>  17 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-time.h
> 

Hm... what's the general status of this? Most of the patches have at
least one R-b/A-b already, I see.

Do the s390-ccw boot maintainers want to pick this (once the rest has
been looked at) and then send me a pull req, or should I pick it when
it is good to go? Softfreeze is less than two weeks away :)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]