qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] target/nios2: Use gen_io_start around wrctl instruction


From: Wu, Wentong
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] target/nios2: Use gen_io_start around wrctl instruction
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:58:50 +0000

> >On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 09:17, Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@intel.com> wrote:

> >

> > wrctl instruction on nios2 target will cause checking cpu

> > interrupt but tcg_handle_interrupt() will call cpu_abort()

> > if the CPU gets an interrupt while it's not in 'can do IO'

> > state, so add gen_io_start around wrctl instruction. Also

> > at the same time, end the onging TB with DISAS_UPDATE.

> >

> > Signed-off-by: Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@intel.com>

> > ---

> >  target/nios2/translate.c | 5 +++++

> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

> >

> > diff --git a/target/nios2/translate.c b/target/nios2/translate.c

> > index 83c10eb2..51347ada 100644

> > --- a/target/nios2/translate.c

> > +++ b/target/nios2/translate.c

> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@

> >  #include "exec/cpu_ldst.h"

> >  #include "exec/translator.h"

> >  #include "qemu/qemu-print.h"

> > +#include "exec/gen-icount.h"

> >

> >  /* is_jmp field values */

> >  #define DISAS_JUMP    DISAS_TARGET_0 /* only pc was modified dynamically */

> > @@ -518,7 +519,11 @@ static void wrctl(DisasContext *dc, uint32_t code,

> > uint32_t flags)

> >      /* If interrupts were enabled using WRCTL, trigger them. */

> >  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)

> >      if ((instr.imm5 + CR_BASE) == CR_STATUS) {

> > +        if (tb_cflags(dc->tb) & CF_USE_ICOUNT) {

> > +            gen_io_start();

> > +        }

> >          gen_helper_check_interrupts(dc->cpu_env);

> > +        dc->is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE;

> >      }

> >  #endif

> >  }

>

> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

 

Hi Peter,

 

Will this be merged? If not, I would like to follow any suggestions, thanks

 

Thanks

 

>

> though as Richard notes ideally the interrupt handling code here should

> be rewritten because the check_interrupts helper is a very weird way

> to implement things.

>

> thanks

> -- PMM

 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]