Re: [PATCH] cpu-models-x86: Fix CPU model name - s/IBR/IBRS/

[Kashyap Chamarthy]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 06:26:23AM -0700, no-reply@patchew.org wrote:
> Patchew URL: 
> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200619125413.2210-1-kchamart@redhat.com/

[...]

> clang -iquote /tmp/qemu-test/build/tests -iquote tests -iquote 
> /tmp/qemu-test/src/tcg/i386 -isystem /tmp/qemu-test/src/linux-headers 
> -isystem /tmp/qemu-test/build/linux-headers -iquote . -iquote 
> /tmp/qemu-test/src -iquote /tmp/qemu-test/src/accel/tcg -iquote 
> /tmp/qemu-test/src/include -iquote /tmp/qemu-test/src/disas/libvixl 
> -I/usr/include/pixman-1   -Werror -fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize=address  
> -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include  -fPIE -DPIE 
> -m64 -mcx16 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wredundant-decls -Wall -Wundef -Wwrite-strings 
> -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fwrapv -std=gnu99  
> -Wold-style-definition -Wtype-limits -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k 
> -Winit-self -Wignored-qualifiers -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs -Wendif-labels 
> -Wexpansion-to-defined -Wno-initializer-overrides -Wno-missing-include-dirs 
> -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-typedef-redefinition 
> -Wno-tautological-type-limit-compare -fstack-protector-strong   
> -I/usr/include/p11-kit-1   -DSTRUCT_IOVEC_DEFINED  -I/usr/include/libpng16  
> -I/usr/include/spice-1 -I/usr/include/spice-server -I/usr/include/cacard 
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/nss3 
> -I/usr/include/nspr4 -pthread -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid 
> -I/usr/include/pixman-1   -I/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests 
> -I/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/qtest -MMD -MP -MT tests/test-crypto-tlssession.o 
> -MF tests/test-crypto-tlssession.d -g   -c -o tests/test-crypto-tlssession.o 
> /tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/test-crypto-tlssession.c
> /tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/qht-bench.c:287:29: error: implicit conversion from 
> 'unsigned long' to 'double' changes value from 18446744073709551615 to 
> 18446744073709551616 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-float-conversion]
>         *threshold = rate * UINT64_MAX;
>                           ~ ^~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/stdint.h:130:23: note: expanded from macro 'UINT64_MAX'


I don't think this failure is related to the submitted patch.  Do I need
to respin?

[...]

-- 
/kashyap