[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH-for-5.1] hw/isa/isa-superio: Fix IDE controller realization
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH-for-5.1] hw/isa/isa-superio: Fix IDE controller realization |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:57:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> writes:
> On 7/21/20 10:15 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> writes:
>>
>>> When realizing a Super I/O with IDE controller [*], we get:
>>>
>>> qom/object.c:1684: object_property_try_add_child: Assertion
>>> `!child->parent' failed.
>>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>>
>>> This is because the device is already realized when we try to
>>> add the QOM property to the parent. Fix by realizing *after*
>>> adding the QOM relationship.
>>>
>>> [*] Set ISASuperIOClass::ide.count = N with N not zero
>>
>> Is this a latent bug, or can it bite in master? If the latter, can you
>> show how to reproduce?
>
> Latent bug for master:
>
> $ git grep ide.count
> hw/isa/isa-superio.c:149: if (k->ide.count && (!k->ide.is_enabled ||
> k->ide.is_enabled(sio, 0))) {
> hw/isa/isa-superio.c:197: sc->ide.count = 0;
> hw/isa/smc37c669-superio.c:100: sc->ide.count = 0;
> hw/isa/vt82c686.c:529: sc->ide.count = 0;
>
> I hit it rebasing undergoing series for 5.2 and testing them.
Let's tweak the commit message like this
[*] Set ISASuperIOClass::ide.count = N with N not zero (no such
thing currently exists; the bug is latent)
Preferably with that or something like it:
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>