[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH for-5.1 5/5] qom: Make info qom-tree sort children more effic
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH for-5.1 5/5] qom: Make info qom-tree sort children more efficiently |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:32:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.14.5 (2020-06-23) |
* Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote:
> Commit e8c9e65816 "qom: Make "info qom-tree" show children sorted"
> sorts children the simple, stupid, quadratic way. I thought the
> number of children would be small enough for this not to matter. I
> was wrong: there are outliers with several hundred children, e.g ARM
> machines nuri and smdkc210 each have a node with 513 children.
Big Power systems can have thousands.
> While n^2 sorting isn't noticeable in normal, human usage even for
> n=513, it can be quite noticeable in certain automated tests. In
> particular, the sort made device-introspect-test even slower. Commit
> 3e7b80f84d "tests: improve performance of device-introspect-test" just
> fixed that by cutting back its excessive use of "info qom-tree".
> Sorting more efficiently makes sense regardless, so do it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> ---
> qom/qom-hmp-cmds.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qom/qom-hmp-cmds.c b/qom/qom-hmp-cmds.c
> index 4032c96089..8861a109d5 100644
> --- a/qom/qom-hmp-cmds.c
> +++ b/qom/qom-hmp-cmds.c
> @@ -94,25 +94,23 @@ typedef struct QOMCompositionState {
>
> static void print_qom_composition(Monitor *mon, Object *obj, int indent);
>
> -static int qom_composition_compare(const void *a, const void *b, void
> *ignore)
> +static int qom_composition_compare(const void *a, const void *b)
> {
> - return g_strcmp0(object_get_canonical_path_component(a),
> - object_get_canonical_path_component(b));
> + return g_strcmp0(object_get_canonical_path_component(*(Object **)a),
> + object_get_canonical_path_component(*(Object **)b));
> }
>
> static int insert_qom_composition_child(Object *obj, void *opaque)
> {
> - GQueue *children = opaque;
> -
> - g_queue_insert_sorted(children, obj, qom_composition_compare, NULL);
> + g_array_append_val(opaque, obj);
> return 0;
> }
>
> static void print_qom_composition(Monitor *mon, Object *obj, int indent)
> {
> + GArray *children = g_array_new(false, false, sizeof(Object *));
> const char *name;
> - GQueue children;
> - Object *child;
> + int i;
>
> if (obj == object_get_root()) {
> name = "";
> @@ -122,11 +120,14 @@ static void print_qom_composition(Monitor *mon, Object
> *obj, int indent)
> monitor_printf(mon, "%*s/%s (%s)\n", indent, "", name,
> object_get_typename(obj));
>
> - g_queue_init(&children);
> - object_child_foreach(obj, insert_qom_composition_child, &children);
> - while ((child = g_queue_pop_head(&children))) {
> - print_qom_composition(mon, child, indent + 2);
> + object_child_foreach(obj, insert_qom_composition_child, children);
> + g_array_sort(children, qom_composition_compare);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < children->len; i++) {
> + print_qom_composition(mon, g_array_index(children, Object *, i),
> + indent + 2);
> }
> + g_array_free(children, TRUE);
So I think that's OK, so :
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Can you just convince me that 'TRUE' in the array_free?
Dave
> }
>
> void hmp_info_qom_tree(Monitor *mon, const QDict *dict)
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
- [PATCH for-5.1 0/5] qom: HMP command fixes, Markus Armbruster, 2020/07/14
- [PATCH for-5.1 4/5] qom: Document object_get_canonical_path() returns malloced string, Markus Armbruster, 2020/07/14
- [PATCH for-5.1 5/5] qom: Make info qom-tree sort children more efficiently, Markus Armbruster, 2020/07/14
- Re: [PATCH for-5.1 5/5] qom: Make info qom-tree sort children more efficiently,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=
- [PATCH for-5.1 2/5] qom: Plug memory leak in "info qom-tree", Markus Armbruster, 2020/07/14
- [PATCH for-5.1 1/5] qdev: Fix device_add DRIVER, help to print to monitor, Markus Armbruster, 2020/07/14