Re: [PATCH] schemas: Add vim modeline

[John Snow]

On 7/31/20 12:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 31/07/20 17:26, John Snow wrote:
> > I saw the critique that we still use JSON-ish for the runtime QMP
> > protocol, and moving the QAPI IDL to a standard wouldn't remove all
> > instances of a custom format from our tree.
>
> Sorry, but "still using JSON" is not a critique that makes any sense.
>
> 99% of the websites you use daily use JSON as their RPC
> frontend-to-backend language; OpenAPI is essentially JSON over HTTP.
> There must be something good in JSON.
>
> Whenever you hear a complaint about "using JSON", it's actually a
> complaint about bindings for your language, which can be a sensible
> critique: gRPC is essentially {protobuf,FlatBuffers} over HTTP/2 plus a
> boatload of language mappings.  Unfortunately C is not one of those
> mappings.
>
> Paolo

You have misunderstood me.

The critique I am relaying, but not raising, is that we already use a 
custom JSON parser in two or more places, and so replacing one instance 
of this with a new format actually complicates QEMU instead of 
simplifies it.

I disagree with this concern on the premise that moving one non-standard 
JSON usage to a standard usage is a win because it reduces the total 
number of instances of proprietary formats.

Further, if we remove ALL instances of proprietary JSON, then we're back 
to the same level of complexity internally, but with a reduced level of 
complexity for outside observers.

This is why I said "JSON-ish", not "JSON".

--js