Re: Suspicious QOM types without instance/class size

[Eduardo Habkost]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:40:12AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.08.20 23:55, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > While trying to convert TypeInfo declarations to the new
> > OBJECT_DECLARE* macros, I've stumbled on a few suspicious cases
> > where instance_size or class_size is not set, despite having type
> > checker macros that use a specific type.
> > 
> > The ones with "WARNING" are abstract types (maybe not serious if
> > subclasses set the appropriate sizes).  The ones with "ERROR"
> > don't seem to be abstract types.
[...]
> > ERROR: hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c:1237:1: class_size should be set to 
> > sizeof(VirtioCcwBusClass)?
> 
> The parent of TYPE_VIRTIO_CCW_BUS is TYPE_VIRTIO_BUS.
> 
> typedef struct VirtioBusClass VirtioCcwBusClass;
> 
> So I guess the sizes match? Anyhow, setting doesn't hurt.

Thanks for checking.  Yeah, the sizes match today.

It's a good idea to set it, just in case a real VirtioCcwBusClass
struct gets created one day.

-- 
Eduardo