[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] x86: cpuhp: refuse cpu hot-unplug request earlier if
From: |
Laszlo Ersek |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] x86: cpuhp: refuse cpu hot-unplug request earlier if not supported |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:50:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
On 08/18/20 14:22, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> CPU hot-unplug with SMM requires firmware participation to prevent
> guest crash (i.e. CPU can be removed only after OS _and_ firmware
> were prepared for the action).
> Previous patches introduced ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_CPU_HOT_UNPLUG_BIT
> feature bit, which is advertised by firmware when it has support
> for CPU hot-unplug. Use it to check if guest is able to handle
> unplug and make device_del fail gracefully if hot-unplug feature
> hasn't been negotiated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - fix typo in commit message
> - drop 5.1 version from hint message (Laszlo)
> ---
> hw/acpi/ich9.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/ich9.c b/hw/acpi/ich9.c
> index 0acc9a3107..95cb0f935b 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/ich9.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/ich9.c
> @@ -460,6 +460,18 @@ void ich9_pm_device_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler
> *hotplug_dev,
> errp);
> } else if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_CPU) &&
> !lpc->pm.cpu_hotplug_legacy) {
> + uint64_t negotiated = lpc->smi_negotiated_features;
> +
> + if (negotiated & BIT_ULL(ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_BROADCAST_BIT) &&
> + !(negotiated & BIT_ULL(ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_CPU_HOT_UNPLUG_BIT))) {
> + error_setg(errp, "cpu hot-unplug with SMI wasn't enabled "
> + "by firmware");
> + error_append_hint(errp, "update machine type to a version having
> "
> + "x-smi-cpu-hotunplug=on and firmware
> that "
> + "supports CPU hot-unplug with SMM");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> acpi_cpu_unplug_request_cb(hotplug_dev, &lpc->pm.cpuhp_state,
> dev, errp);
> } else {
>
A trivial comment:
Patch#2 says "x86: cphp: " in the subject line, but patch#3 says "x86:
cpuhp: " (note the extra "u").
I'm fine with either "cphp" or "cpuhp", but the subjects should be
consistent -- both patches should use the same word.
Preserve my T-b and R-b on both patches #2 and #3, after fixing up one
of the subjects. (Up to you which one.)
Thanks!
Laszlo
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] x86: lpc9: let firmware negotiate 'CPU hotplug with SMI' features, (continued)
[PATCH v3 1/7] x86: lpc9: let firmware negotiate 'CPU hotplug with SMI' features, Igor Mammedov, 2020/08/20
[PATCH v2 2/7] x86: cphp: prevent guest crash on CPU hotplug when broadcast SMI is in use, Igor Mammedov, 2020/08/18
[PATCH v2 3/7] x86: cpuhp: refuse cpu hot-unplug request earlier if not supported, Igor Mammedov, 2020/08/18
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] x86: cpuhp: refuse cpu hot-unplug request earlier if not supported,
Laszlo Ersek <=
[PATCH v2 4/7] acpi: add aml_land() and aml_break() primitives, Igor Mammedov, 2020/08/18
[PATCH v2 5/7] tests: acpi: mark to be changed tables in bios-tables-test-allowed-diff, Igor Mammedov, 2020/08/18
[PATCH v2 6/7] x68: acpi: trigger SMI before sending hotplug Notify event to OSPM, Igor Mammedov, 2020/08/18