qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 14/63] i8254: Rename TYPE_I8254 to TYPE_PIT


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/63] i8254: Rename TYPE_I8254 to TYPE_PIT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:18:09 -0400

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 02:47:03PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 9/3/20 12:42 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > This will make the type name constant consistent with the name of
> > the type checking macro.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > ---
> >  include/hw/timer/i8254.h | 4 ++--
> >  hw/timer/i8254.c         | 4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/hw/timer/i8254.h b/include/hw/timer/i8254.h
> > index 1a522a2457..ddd925074f 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/timer/i8254.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/timer/i8254.h
> > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ typedef struct PITCommonClass PITCommonClass;
> >  DECLARE_OBJ_CHECKERS(PITCommonState, PITCommonClass,
> >                       PIT_COMMON, TYPE_PIT_COMMON)
> >  
> > -#define TYPE_I8254 "isa-pit"
> > +#define TYPE_PIT "isa-pit"
> 
> I disagree with this patch, as we have various PIT and only one I8254.

I was unsure about this, and I agree with your point.  I will
suggest renaming the PIT macro to I8254 instead.

-- 
Eduardo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]