[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] tests/meson.build: fp tests don't need CONFIG_TCG
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] tests/meson.build: fp tests don't need CONFIG_TCG |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:08:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
On 9/7/20 11:55 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 9/7/20 11:11 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Il gio 3 set 2020, 13:21 Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>>> As the tests build only softfloat.c no actual TCG machinary is neede
>>>>> to test them (as is evidenced by GCC check-softfloat). Might as well
>>>>> fix the wording on Travis while at it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The reason is that softfloat is not built at all into QEMU if !CONFIG_TCG.
>>>> We similarly skip block layer tests if !CONFIG_SOFTMMU &&
>>>> !CONFIG_TOOLS.
>>>
>>> It's not built anyway if you don't call the test. Are you saying a
>>> --disable-system and --disable-user build is invalid for running unit
>>> tests? That is what check-softfloat is doing as it doesn't involve
>>> softfloat built into any qemu binary.
>>
>> FYI my tools build dir is configured as:
>>
>> '--enable-trace-backends=log' '--disable-docs' '--enable-debug'
>> '--disable-system' '--disable-user' '--enable-tools'
>>
>> and it still works after the Meson conversion.
>
> But check-softfloat doesn't work with that right?
Sorry I can't say, I don't test it :/
[PATCH v1 7/8] target/mips: simplify gen_compute_imm_branch logic, Alex Bennée, 2020/09/03
Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] some testing and CI updates (re-greening), Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/09/03