qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] hw/arm/virt: spe: Add SPE fdt binding for virt mach


From: Andrew Jones
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] hw/arm/virt: spe: Add SPE fdt binding for virt machine
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:16:25 +0200

This patch does much more than the summary "hw/arm/virt: spe: Add SPE fdt
binding for virt machine" says it does. Please revise the summary.

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:13:27AM +0000, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Add a virtual SPE device for virt machine while using
> PPI 5 for SPE overflow interrupt number which has already
> selected in kvmtool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@linaro.org>
> ---
>  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c    |  3 +++
>  hw/arm/virt.c               | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h |  3 +++
>  include/hw/arm/virt.h       |  1 +
>  target/arm/cpu.c            |  2 ++
>  target/arm/cpu.h            |  2 ++
>  6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> index 9efd7a3881..3fd80fda53 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -665,6 +665,9 @@ build_madt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, 
> VirtMachineState *vms)
>          if (arm_feature(&armcpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_PMU)) {
>              gicc->performance_interrupt = cpu_to_le32(PPI(VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ));
>          }
> +        if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_spe, armcpu)) {
> +            gicc->spe_interrupt = cpu_to_le32(PPI(VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ));
> +        }
>          if (vms->virt) {
>              gicc->vgic_interrupt = cpu_to_le32(PPI(ARCH_GIC_MAINT_IRQ));
>          }
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index 6bacfb668d..bdb1ce925c 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -545,6 +545,32 @@ static void fdt_add_pmu_nodes(const VirtMachineState 
> *vms)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static void fdt_add_spe_nodes(const VirtMachineState *vms)
> +{
> +    ARMCPU *armcpu = ARM_CPU(first_cpu);
> +    uint32_t irqflags = GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_LEVEL_HI;
> +
> +    if (!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_spe, armcpu)) {
> +        assert(!object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(armcpu), "spe", NULL));
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (vms->gic_version == VIRT_GIC_VERSION_2) {
> +        irqflags = deposit32(irqflags, GIC_FDT_IRQ_PPI_CPU_START,
> +                             GIC_FDT_IRQ_PPI_CPU_WIDTH,
> +                             (1 << vms->smp_cpus) - 1);
> +    }
> +
> +    qemu_fdt_add_subnode(vms->fdt, "/spe");
> +    if (arm_feature(&armcpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_V8)) {
> +        const char compat[] = "arm,statistical-profiling-extension-v1";
> +        qemu_fdt_setprop(vms->fdt, "/spe", "compatible",
> +                         compat, sizeof(compat));
> +        qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(vms->fdt, "/spe", "interrupts",
> +                               GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI, VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ, 
> irqflags);
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  static inline DeviceState *create_acpi_ged(VirtMachineState *vms)
>  {
>      DeviceState *dev;
> @@ -717,6 +743,10 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms)
>                                      qdev_get_gpio_in(vms->gic, ppibase
>                                                       + VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ));
>  
> +        qdev_connect_gpio_out_named(cpudev, "spe-interrupt", 0,
> +                                    qdev_get_gpio_in(vms->gic, ppibase
> +                                                     + VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ));
> +
>          sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i, qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, 
> ARM_CPU_IRQ));
>          sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i + smp_cpus,
>                             qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_FIQ));
> @@ -1664,11 +1694,12 @@ static void finalize_gic_version(VirtMachineState 
> *vms)
>  
>  static void virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms)
>  {
> -    bool aarch64, pmu;
> +    bool aarch64, pmu, spe;
>      CPUState *cpu;
>  
>      aarch64 = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "aarch64", NULL);
>      pmu = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "pmu", NULL);
> +    spe = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "spe", NULL);
>  
>      if (kvm_enabled()) {
>          CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
> @@ -1679,6 +1710,14 @@ static void virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms)
>                  }
>                  kvm_arm_pmu_init(cpu);
>              }
> +
> +            if (spe) {
> +                assert(ARM_CPU(cpu)->has_spe == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON);
> +                if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> +                    kvm_arm_spe_set_irq(cpu, PPI(VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ));
> +                }
> +                kvm_arm_spe_init(cpu);

A later patch introduces userspace irqchip support. Should we avoid
allowing it until then to avoid breaking bisection?

> +            }
>          }
>      } else {
>          if (aarch64 && vms->highmem) {
> @@ -1927,6 +1966,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>  
>      fdt_add_pmu_nodes(vms);
>  
> +    fdt_add_spe_nodes(vms);
> +
>      create_uart(vms, VIRT_UART, sysmem, serial_hd(0));
>  
>      if (vms->secure) {
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> index 38a42f409a..21e58f27c5 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> @@ -302,6 +302,9 @@ struct AcpiMadtGenericCpuInterface {
>      uint32_t vgic_interrupt;
>      uint64_t gicr_base_address;
>      uint64_t arm_mpidr;
> +    uint8_t  efficiency_class;
> +    uint8_t  reserved2[1];
> +    uint16_t spe_interrupt; /* ACPI 6.3 */
>  } QEMU_PACKED;
>  
>  typedef struct AcpiMadtGenericCpuInterface AcpiMadtGenericCpuInterface;
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> index 72c269aaa5..6013b6d535 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>  #define ARCH_TIMER_NS_EL1_IRQ 14
>  #define ARCH_TIMER_NS_EL2_IRQ 10
>  
> +#define VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ 5
>  #define VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ 7
>  
>  #define PPI(irq) ((irq) + 16)
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> index f211958eaa..786cc6134c 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
> @@ -1041,6 +1041,8 @@ static void arm_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
>                               "gicv3-maintenance-interrupt", 1);
>      qdev_init_gpio_out_named(DEVICE(cpu), &cpu->pmu_interrupt,
>                               "pmu-interrupt", 1);
> +    qdev_init_gpio_out_named(DEVICE(cpu), &cpu->spe_interrupt,
> +                             "spe-interrupt", 1);
>  #endif
>  
>      /* DTB consumers generally don't in fact care what the 'compatible'
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index baf2bbcee8..395a1e5df8 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -800,6 +800,8 @@ struct ARMCPU {
>      qemu_irq gicv3_maintenance_interrupt;
>      /* GPIO output for the PMU interrupt */
>      qemu_irq pmu_interrupt;
> +    /* GPIO output for the SPE interrupt */
> +    qemu_irq spe_interrupt;
>  
>      /* MemoryRegion to use for secure physical accesses */
>      MemoryRegion *secure_memory;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> 

Otherwise

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]